MAF Sensor Calibration via Intake Manifold Flow Calculation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

MAF sensors in internal combustion engines lose accuracy due to factors like setup variables, flow turbulence, and material aging, leading to decreased precision in engine control and potential non-compliance with emission regulations.

Innovation Solution

A method to evaluate and recalibrate MAF sensors by operating the engine at various speed and load combinations, recording sensor output signals, and calculating mass flow through the intake system, allowing for the creation of a new transfer function to ensure accurate calibration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If MAF sensor calibration is performed under controlled conditions at manufacture, then initial calibration accuracy is improved, but calibration accuracy deteriorates over time due to aging and operational factors

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveMAF sensor calibration accuracyVSAvoidcalibration stability over time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calibration actions by establishing a baseline transfer function during manufacture under controlled conditions. This preliminary calibration is then continuously refined through operational adjustments, allowing the system to maintain accuracy despite aging and environmental changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from actual engine operation to continuously monitor and adjust MAF sensor calibration. By comparing measured airflow with calculated airflow based on engine parameters, the system detects drift and triggers recalibration to maintain measurement precision over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If MAF sensor calibration is not re-checked, then operational simplicity is maintained, but calibration accuracy deteriorates unnoticed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational simplicityVSAvoidcalibration accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-diagnosis by automatically monitoring MAF sensor output against calculated expectations based on engine parameters. When calibration drift is detected, the system autonomously initiates recalibration procedures without requiring external intervention, maintaining both operational simplicity and measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Continuous feedback monitoring compares actual MAF readings with theoretically calculated airflow values. This feedback mechanism automatically detects calibration degradation and triggers appropriate corrective actions, eliminating the need for manual calibration checks while preserving accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If EGR flow is allowed during calibration evaluation, then normal engine operation is maintained, but calibration accuracy deteriorates due to mixed flow composition

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine operational continuityVSAvoidmass flow measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The calibration evaluation process temporarily extracts or isolates the fresh air flow component from the total intake flow by controlling EGR valve closure. This separation allows independent measurement and calibration of the MAF sensor against known fresh air flow rates, eliminating the confounding effect of recirculated exhaust gas on calibration accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Measurement precision

If multiple engine speed and load combinations are tested, then calibration accuracy across operating range is improved, but calibration time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalibration accuracy across operating rangeVSAvoidcalibration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs calibration evaluation at multiple engine speed and load combinations to ensure accuracy across the full operating range. By systematically testing representative operating points rather than attempting to test every possible condition, the system achieves comprehensive calibration coverage while minimizing unnecessary time expenditure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9175623B2Mass airflow sensor calibration evaluation
Publication Date: 2015.11.03 INT ENGINE INTPROP CO LLC
  • US9175623B2 patent drawing
  • US9175623B2 patent drawing
  • US9175623B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An engine has a controller for causing an EGR system to disallow EGR while concurrently executing a strategy for evaluating calibration of a mass airflow sensor in an intake system by operating the engine at each of different combinations of engine speed and engine load, and for each combination of engine speed and engine load, recording a corresponding output signal of the sensor and also calculating mass flow passing through an intake manifold as a function of intake manifold pressure, intake manifold temperature, speed of the engine, and volumetric efficiency of the engine. The output signal of the MAF sensor and the calculated mass flow passing through the intake manifold at least one combination of engine speed and engine load are used to evaluate the calibration the MAF sensor.