Maglev Levitation Generator Control for Track Shift Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Magnetic levitation systems face challenges in maintaining consistent levitation forces and adapting to changing track conditions, such as ground shifts due to weather or weight, which can affect the stability and efficiency of transportation systems.

Innovation Solution

The system employs a levitation generator with adjustable orientation, including pitch and yaw, to maintain levitation and direction control by varying the magnetic flux interaction with guide rails, allowing for smooth path switching and maneuverability in guideway transportation systems with coextensive spaced guide rails.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If magnetic levitation systems use fixed spacing between magnets and track, then the system structure is simple, but the levitation force becomes inconsistent when ground shifts occur due to weather or weight

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelevitation force consistencyVSAvoidlevitation control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adjustment of magnetic pole orientation (pitch and yaw angles) to maintain consistent levitation forces despite ground shifts. The control system continuously monitors position and adjusts the magnetic poles' angles relative to the track, transforming a static system into a dynamic one that adapts to changing conditions, thereby resolving the contradiction between reliability and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs feedback control mechanisms where sensors detect ground shifts and track position changes, and the control system responds by adjusting the magnetic pole orientations. This closed-loop feedback ensures levitation force consistency while managing system complexity through intelligent control algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the track is kept substantially level to maintain stable levitation, then levitation stability is improved, but the track requires frequent repairs due to ground shifts from weather or weight

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelevitation stabilityVSAvoidtrack maintenance difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical requirement for a perfectly level track with a magnetic control system that actively adjusts pole orientations. Instead of mechanically constraining the track to remain level (which requires frequent repairs), the system uses magnetic field adjustments to compensate for track irregularities, eliminating the need for strict mechanical precision and reducing maintenance demands.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters (pitch and yaw angles of magnetic poles) to adapt to track conditions rather than requiring the track to maintain fixed geometric parameters. This parameter adjustment allows stable levitation over irregular terrain, reducing track maintenance requirements while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If the levitation system uses fixed magnetic pole orientation, then the system complexity is reduced, but the system cannot adapt to changing track conditions or perform path switching

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrack condition adaptationVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adjustment mechanisms for magnetic pole orientations, allowing the system to adapt to changing track conditions and perform path switching. The ability to vary pitch and yaw angles in real-time provides versatility while the control system manages the added complexity through coordinated adjustment algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Ease of operation

If magnetic levitation systems rely on passive magnetic interaction, then the system simplicity is maintained, but the system cannot provide active control for levitation and centering functions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelevitation control capabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system combines passive magnetic interaction with active control capabilities, where the magnetic poles serve dual functions: providing passive levitation forces and enabling active control through orientation adjustments. This self-service approach allows the same magnetic components to perform both passive support and active control, managing complexity while enhancing operational capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution ensures stable and efficient levitation and direction control, enabling vehicles to navigate diverse track conditions and path changes, enhancing ride stability and safety while supporting higher loads and speeds.

Implementation Method 1

the levitation generator (106) configured to generate a magnetic flux, the magnetic flux varying with velocity of the transport apparatus (100) along the guideway (104)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

the drive generator (102) configured to generate a drive magnetic flux

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 3

When the elongated magnetic pole moves along the rail, the magnetic field from the elongated magnetic pole induces eddy currents in the rail, and the eddy currents in the rail produce lift upon the elongated magnetic pole

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEddy currents: Eddy Currents

Data Source

PatentUS11890946B2Levitation control system for a transportation system
Publication Date: 2024.02.06 SKYTRAN INC
  • US11890946B2 patent drawing
  • US11890946B2 patent drawing
  • US11890946B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Transport apparatus having at least one levitation generator and at least one drive generator. The at least one levitation generator configured to generate a levitating magnetic flux, move within a corresponding at least one lifting member, and elevate above a rest position relative to the at least one lifting member in response to the levitating magnetic flux. The at least one drive generator configured to generate a driving magnetic flux, move within a corresponding at least one drive member, and laterally move relative to the at least one drive member in response to the driving magnetic flux. At least a portion of the at least one levitation generator is movable relative to the at least one drive generator.