Magnesium Alloy Composition for Biodegradable Implants

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current magnesium alloys for biodegradable implants lack sufficient tensile strength, corrosion resistance, and mechanical symmetry, leading to premature degradation and failure in physiological environments, with existing approaches failing to achieve the properties of permanent implants like titanium alloys.

Innovation Solution

A magnesium alloy with specific compositions of Zn, Ca, and rare earth elements, combined with tightly controlled impurity levels, is developed to enhance corrosion resistance, mechanical properties, and degradation rate, featuring a fine grain structure and controlled intermetallic phase formation to maintain electrochemical stability and mechanical integrity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If conventional casting methods with standard impurity tolerance limits are used, then manufacturing ease is improved, but corrosion resistance deteriorates due to formation of electrochemically noble intermetallic phases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing easeVSAvoidcorrosion resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by establishing significantly stricter impurity tolerance limits compared to conventional standards. The total impurity content is limited to 0.0048% by weight (preferably 0.0045% or 0.0036%), with individual impurities like Fe, Si, Mn, Co, Ni, Cu, Al, and Zr each limited to 0.0038% by weight. This parameter change prevents the formation of electrochemically noble intermetallic phases that cause galvanic corrosion, thereby improving corrosion resistance while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through controlled production processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Strength

If alloying elements are added to increase tensile strength, then strength is improved, but mechanical asymmetry increases leading to premature failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetensile strengthVSAvoidmechanical symmetry
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses parameter changes by precisely controlling the composition ranges of alloying elements (Zn: 3-7%, Ca: 0.001-0.5%, rare earths: ≤0.001%) and severely limiting impurity contents. This compositional control achieves tensile strength ≥275 MPa (preferably ≥300 MPa) while minimizing mechanical asymmetry between tension and compression properties, preventing premature failure in physiological environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite material system by combining magnesium with specific alloying elements (Zn, Ca, rare earths) and严格控制 impurities. This composite approach achieves both high strength and mechanical symmetry, as the controlled composition prevents formation of harmful intermetallic phases while maintaining a homogeneous microstructure with fine grain size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Manufacturing precision

If impurity tolerance limits are relaxed for easier manufacturing, then manufacturing precision is improved, but electrochemical stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpurity control precisionVSAvoidelectrochemical stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by setting extremely strict impurity tolerance limits (total ≤0.0048%, individual elements ≤0.0038%) that represent a significant tightening compared to conventional standards. This parameter change ensures electrochemical stability by preventing formation of galvanic cells between magnesium matrix and electrochemically noble impurities, while the clear specification enables manufacturing precision through controlled production processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The alloy achieves significantly improved tensile strength, proof stress, and reduced mechanical asymmetry, enabling biodegradable implants to withstand multiaxial loads and maintain structural integrity during the required support period without protective layers, while optimizing degradation rates.

Implementation Method 1

zinc improves the mechanical properties and results in grain refining

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolid solution hardening: Solid Solution Strengthening

Implementation Method 2

Calcium exhibits a pronounced grain refining effect

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGrain refining: Grain Boundary Strengthening

Implementation Method 3

form eutectic systems with partial solubility on the magnesium-rich side of the binary phase diagrams such that precipitation hardening is possible

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPrecipitation hardening: Precipitation Hardening

Implementation Method 4

increased tensile strength due to solid solution and precipitation hardening

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolid solution hardening: Solid Solution Strengthening

Implementation Method 5

increased tensile strength due to solid solution and precipitation hardening

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPrecipitation hardening: Precipitation Hardening

Data Source

PatentEP3693481A1Magnesium alloy, method for the production thereof and use thereof
Publication Date: 2020.08.12 BIOTRONIK AG
  • EP3693481A1 patent drawing
  • EP3693481A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a magnesium alloy and to a method for the production thereof and to the use thereof, the magnesium alloy comprising: 3 to 7.0% Zn, 0.001 to 0.5% Ca, the remainder being magnesium containing impurities, which promote electrochemical potential differences and/or the formation of intermetallic phases, in a total amount of no more than 0.005 of Fe, Si, Mn, Co, Ni, Cu, Al, Zr and P, wherein the alloying elements are selected from the group of the rare earths having the ordinal numbers 21, 39, 57 to 71 and 89 to 103 in a total amount of no more than 0.001% by weight.