Magnesium Oxychloride Board Composition for Lower Density and Fire Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current magnesium oxychloride (MOC) boards used in construction are heavy, costly, and suffer from issues such as high water absorption, mold growth, reduced fire resistance, and fastener corrosion, with traditional fillers like wood particles and EPS reducing performance.

Innovation Solution

A formulation using low-density fillers like expanded perlite and vermiculite, combined with phosphoric acid/phosphate salts and iron/aluminum salts, and geopolymer coatings, along with specific mixing techniques to create lightweight, fire-resistant, and corrosion-resistant MOC boards.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If wood particles are used as filler material, then cost is reduced and flexibility is improved, but fire resistance is significantly reduced and mold growth is supported

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecostVSAvoidfire resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical composition parameters by replacing organic wood particles with inorganic fillers (perlite, vermiculite, glass beads) that have different fire resistance properties. This parameter change eliminates the fire safety issue while maintaining cost-effectiveness through the use of abundant inorganic materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite material system combining MOC cement with inorganic fillers (perlite, vermiculite, glass beads) and reinforcing fibers. This composite approach maintains the structural integrity and flexibility benefits of filled materials while eliminating the fire safety problems associated with organic wood particles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Weight of stationary object

If EPS beads are used as fillers, then density is reduced and cost is reduced, but fire performance is significantly reduced and physical strength is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedensityVSAvoidfire performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of stationary objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the filler material parameters from organic EPS beads to inorganic materials (perlite, vermiculite, glass beads) that provide similar density reduction benefits but with superior fire resistance. These inorganic fillers maintain low density while being non-combustible.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces EPS beads (which are cheap but have short fire resistance life) with inorganic fillers that provide comparable cost benefits but with indefinite fire resistance. The inorganic materials do not decompose or melt under fire conditions like EPS does.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If MOC cement is used, then fire retardancy is provided through endothermic reactions, but mechanical strength is lost when decomposed by fire

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire retardancyVSAvoidmechanical strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a composite system where MOC cement provides fire retardancy through its endothermic decomposition reactions, while inorganic fillers (perlite, vermiculite) and reinforcing fibers (glass, basalt, steel) provide structural strength. The composite structure ensures that when MOC decomposes, the framework of fillers and fibers maintains mechanical integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different materials with different functions to different parts of the composite: MOC cement provides fire protection, inorganic fillers provide structural framework and strength, while fibers provide reinforcement. This local specialization of functions allows the material to maintain strength during fire exposure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Object-affected harmful factors

If current MOC board formulations are used, then fire retardant properties are achieved, but density is greater than 0.8 grams/cm3 making boards too heavy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire retardant propertiesVSAvoiddensity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the density parameter by replacing dense traditional fillers with lightweight inorganic materials (perlite, vermiculite, glass beads). These materials have lower density while maintaining fire resistance, achieving density below 0.8 grams/cm3 without sacrificing fire safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite formulation combining MOC cement with lightweight inorganic fillers (perlite, vermiculite, glass beads) and fibers. This composite structure reduces overall density while maintaining fire retardant properties through the MOC cement matrix and the non-combustible nature of the inorganic fillers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

5Strength

If high chloride content MOC cement is used, then strength is achieved, but fastener corrosion problems occur

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoidfastener corrosion
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary protective layer or modification to the MOC cement system that reduces chloride release. This could include surface treatments, encapsulation of chloride sources, or chemical modifications that prevent chloride migration to fasteners, thereby protecting against corrosion while maintaining the high strength benefits of MOC cement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution results in boards with improved strength, reduced density, and enhanced fire resistance, while minimizing water absorption and fastener corrosion, suitable for construction applications.

Implementation Method 1

MOC cement, also known as Sorel cement, has been used in many parts of the world. It is made by lightly burned magnesium oxide, magnesium chloride, water, and additives.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydration reaction: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 2

A formulation using low-density fillers like expanded perlite and vermiculite, combined with phosphoric acid/phosphate salts and iron/aluminum salts

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reaction: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 3

A formulation using low-density fillers like expanded perlite and vermiculite

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal expansion: Thermal Expansion

Implementation Method 4

combined with phosphoric acid/phosphate salts and iron/aluminum salts

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydrolysis: Hydrolysis

Implementation Method 5

Factors limiting the wide spread use of the MOC boards include high cost, relatively high density, and the perception of poor handling by the construction industry

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapillary action: Capillary Action

Data Source

PatentUS12428345B2Fire retardant construction materials
Publication Date: 2025.09.30 GT MGO CORP
  • US12428345B2 patent drawing
  • US12428345B2 patent drawing
  • US12428345B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This application relates to making magnesium oxychloride boards. A magnesium oxychloride slurry is mixed by directing magnesium chloride, magnesium oxide, at least one phosphate, at least one inorganic salt, and water into a mixer and mixing these ingredients together to form a slurry. At least one filler is then mixed with the slurry. The slurry is directed to a mold. The mold is formed with the slurry to form a magnesium oxychloride board. The magnesium oxychloride board is then cured.