Magnet Keys for Thin Computing Devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional keyboards in thin computing devices face manufacturing and reliability issues due to the use of rubber domes, which occupy significant space and limit key travel and feel.

Innovation Solution

The use of magnets and flanges with a circuit board and webbing to detect key presses, eliminating the need for rubber domes and reducing the required space, while maintaining a similar spring-like action through magnetic repulsion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If rubber domes are used in conventional keyboards, then key press detection is achieved, but the volume occupied by keys increases and reliability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvekey reliabilityVSAvoidvolume occupied by keys
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical rubber dome system with a magnetic field-based detection system. Magnets are positioned beneath the keycap, and a Hall effect sensor detects changes in the magnetic field when the key is pressed, eliminating the need for physical rubber domes and their associated space requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the detection parameter from physical contact (mechanical) to magnetic field strength changes. By measuring the change in magnetic field intensity when a key is depressed, the system achieves key press detection without requiring the physical deformation mechanisms of rubber domes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If rubber domes are used in conventional keyboards, then key press detection is achieved, but manufacturing precision and reliability are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing reliabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical rubber dome system with a magnetic field-based detection system. Magnets are positioned beneath the keycap, and a Hall effect sensor detects changes in the magnetic field when the key is pressed, eliminating the need for physical rubber domes and their associated space requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Force

If rubber domes are used in conventional keyboards, then spring force is generated, but space underneath keycaps is excessively occupied

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespring forceVSAvoidspace underneath keycaps
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical rubber dome system with a magnetic field-based detection system. Magnets are positioned beneath the keycap, and a Hall effect sensor detects changes in the magnetic field when the key is pressed, eliminating the need for physical rubber domes and their associated space requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution reduces the volume occupied by keys, enhances reliability, and allows for thinner device designs without compromising the tactile feedback and press detection accuracy.

Implementation Method 1

a magnet mounted to the keycap... opposing poles of the magnetic plate and the magnet are oriented towards one another, and the magnetic plate and the magnet attract one another

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic force: Magnetism

Implementation Method 2

webbing adjacent to the set of flanges. The webbing is configured to prevent the keycap from being removed from the device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical constraint: Physical Containment

Data Source

PatentUS9978543B1Magnet keys
Publication Date: 2018.05.22 GOOGLE LLC
  • US9978543B1 patent drawing
  • US9978543B1 patent drawing
  • US9978543B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the disclosure relate generally to keyboards for computing devices. For example, rather than using a dome, the keycap may include one or more magnets. In one example, a second magnet may be placed adjacent to a switch or magnetic sensor on a circuit board. The magnets may be arranged so that they repel one another in order to force the keycap away from the switch. Webbing between the keycaps may be used to keep the keycaps from falling off of the device. To keep the keycap from moving laterally, the keycap may include two or more flanges held in place by rails. Other arrangements of magnets or magnetic plates may also be used. If a magnetic sensor is used, it may be calibrated to adjust the sensitivity of the keys, for example, how far a user must press the keycap in order to have the pressing register.