Permanent Magnet Rotor Tongue Locking to Reduce Micromovement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for securing permanent magnets in rotary electric machines, such as adhesive bonding and impregnation, are costly, complex, and can lead to magnetic performance losses due to clearance issues and micromovements, which affect the machine's efficiency and durability.

Innovation Solution

A rotor design featuring a deformable tongue in the rotor body that bends to press against the small side of the permanent magnet, mechanically locking it in place without the need for adhesives, thereby minimizing micromovements and magnetic losses, and allowing for better magnetic flux flow.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If adhesive bonding is used to secure magnets in recesses, then magnets are locked in place, but the process becomes lengthy and complex requiring heating and cooling operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnet securingVSAvoidbonding process
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the magnet from the recess after insertion, eliminating the need for adhesive bonding. The magnet is temporarily held during insertion but then removed, allowing the recess to be filled with adhesive that bonds the magnet to the rotor body without requiring complex heating and cooling operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention performs preliminary insertion of the magnet into the recess before final bonding. The magnet is first inserted and held in position, then the adhesive is applied, and finally the magnet is secured. This preliminary action allows for proper adhesive distribution and bonding without requiring complex equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If adhesive bonding is used to secure magnets, then magnets are locked in place, but leakage occurs affecting cleanliness and production complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnet securingVSAvoidadhesive leakage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The magnet is extracted from the recess after insertion but before final bonding. This extraction allows the adhesive to be properly applied and distributed in the recess without the magnet interfering, preventing leakage and ensuring clean bonding without affecting production complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If magnets with specific shapes are used to improve securing, then magnet retention is enhanced, but production cost significantly increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnet retentionVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses the magnet's own geometric features (protrusions or recesses) to engage with corresponding features in the rotor body, allowing the magnet to self-secure without requiring complex external retention mechanisms. This self-service approach maintains reliability while using standard magnet shapes for cost-effective production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Ease of operation

If clearance is maintained between magnets and recesses for mounting ease, then magnet insertion is facilitated, but magnetic performance is reduced due to air gap losses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnet insertionVSAvoidmagnetic flux loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the dimensional parameters of the magnet and recess to achieve optimal fit. The magnet is designed with dimensions that allow minimal clearance for easy insertion while maintaining sufficient contact area to minimize air gap losses and maximize magnetic flux flow between the magnet and rotor body.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enhances the magnetic performance and reduces manufacturing costs by securely locking the magnets in place, minimizing micromovements and noise, while maintaining optimal magnetic flux flow.

Implementation Method 1

at least one sheet including at least one deformable tongue connecting to said face of the recess and extending into the recess, the deformable tongue being angled and including a bendable portion that is configured to press against the small side of the permanent magnet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS20230378830A1Rotor for a rotary electric machine
Publication Date: 2023.11.23 NIDEC PAS EMOTORS
  • US20230378830A1 patent drawing
  • US20230378830A1 patent drawing
  • US20230378830A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Rotor (30) for a rotary electric machine, including:at least one permanent magnet (1) having, in cross section, at least one large side (2a) and at least one small side (3a),a rotor body (33) including stacked sheets, the rotor body (33) including at least one recess (4) receiving the permanent magnet (1), the recess (4) being delimited by at least one face (5a) opposite the large side (2a) of the permanent magnet (1),at least one sheet (6) including at least one deformable tongue (7) connecting to the face (5a) of the recess (4) and extending into the recess (4), the deformable tongue (7) being angled and including a foldable portion (8) configured to be pressed against the small side (3a) of the permanent magnet (1).