Bi-Directional Magnet Valve Actuation for Higher Torque Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems for controlling mechanical valves require either multiple solenoids or large torque electric motors, which are expensive and inefficient, limiting their functionality and cost-effectiveness.

Innovation Solution

The use of a pair of bi-directional magnet actuators, each capable of applying both pushing and pulling forces, coupled with a controller that concurrently actuates both to move the valve in both directions, reducing the need for large motors and increasing efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single solenoid actuator is used to rotate mechanical valves, then the system complexity is reduced, but the torque capability and functional versatility are significantly limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuator configurationVSAvoidtorque capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The valve actuation system is segmented into two independent magnet actuators instead of using a single actuator. Each magnet actuator can independently generate force in both directions, allowing them to work concurrently to produce additive torque on the valve, thereby resolving the contradiction between simplified design and sufficient torque capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The forces from two magnet actuators are merged to act on the same valve simultaneously. By coordinating the actuators to push or pull in the same rotational direction, their forces combine additively to generate high torque output, overcoming the limitation of single-actuator systems while maintaining relatively simple device architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Force

If multiple solenoids are used to control valve movement in opposite directions, then the torque capability is improved, but the system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque capabilityVSAvoidactuator configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Each magnet actuator is designed with multi-functionality, capable of generating force in both directions (pushing and pulling) rather than being unidirectional like traditional solenoids. This universal capability allows two actuators to work together in the same direction for high torque, or in opposite directions for precise positioning, reducing the need for separate actuators for each direction and simplifying the overall system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically coordinates the two magnet actuators based on the required valve position and torque demand. The controller can adjust the force contribution of each actuator in real-time, allowing flexible operation modes such as both actuators pushing, both pulling, or one pushing while the other resists, thereby achieving high torque capability with adaptive control rather than fixed mechanical configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Force

If a large torque electric motor is used to rotate mechanical valves, then the torque capability is sufficient, but the power consumption and system size increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque capabilityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using a continuously running motor to maintain torque, the system employs magnet actuators that apply force only when needed to move or hold the valve in a specific position. The actuators can be activated partially (for positioning) or excessively (for overcoming high friction or load), providing torque capability on-demand rather than continuously, thereby reducing overall power consumption while maintaining sufficient torque when required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces a traditional electric motor with magnet actuators that use electromagnetic fields to generate force directly without mechanical rotation. This substitution eliminates the need for motors, gearboxes, and other mechanical transmission components, reducing power consumption, system size, and complexity while maintaining the ability to generate high torque through coordinated actuator operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enables efficient and cost-effective actuation of valves by providing additive motive forces, reducing the size and power consumption of the system while improving response time and torque capabilities.

Implementation Method 1

a first magnet actuator coupled to the valve, a second magnet actuator coupled to the valve, and a controller connected to the first magnet actuator and the second magnet actuator, the controller configured to concurrently actuate the first magnet actuator to urge the valve in one of the first direction and the second direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic force: Lorentz Force

Data Source

PatentUS20240240728A1Electrically actuated valve control
Publication Date: 2024.07.18 G W LISK CO INC
  • US20240240728A1 patent drawing
  • US20240240728A1 patent drawing
  • US20240240728A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus for selectively actuating a valve moveable in a first direction and a second direction relative to a valve body, the apparatus including a first magnet actuator coupled to the valve, a second magnet actuator coupled to the valve, and a controller connected to the first magnet actuator and the second magnet actuator, the controller configured to concurrently actuate the first magnet actuator to urge the valve in one of the first direction and the second direction, and the second magnet actuator to urge the valve in the one of the first direction and the second direction.