Magnetic Actuator State Variable Ascertainment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for determining state variables of magnetic actuators, such as position, speed, or magnetization state, in applications like factory automation and vehicle transmissions, face challenges in precision due to limited sensor systems and cost constraints, particularly in installations where dedicated sensor systems are not feasible.

Innovation Solution

A method that reads in sensor values representing instantaneous current and voltage, using approximation functions with preprocessed sensor values and additional sensor values from earlier times, to calculate state variables with enhanced precision, potentially incorporating hysteresis models and neural networks, allowing for precise determination of state variables without a dedicated sensor system.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a dedicated sensor system is installed to measure state variables directly, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestate variable determination accuracyVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses voltage and current sensor values as intermediary measurements to indirectly determine state variables (position, speed, magnetization) through approximation functions, avoiding the need for direct sensors for these variables

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces physical sensor systems with a mathematical evaluation system that uses approximation functions to calculate state variables from electrical measurements, substituting mechanical/sensor-based measurement with computational analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Device complexity

If only current sensor values are used for state variable determination, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor system simplicityVSAvoidstate variable determination accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple sensor value types (voltage and current measurements) into a unified evaluation system that uses approximation functions to determine state variables, leveraging complementary information from different physical quantities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds the voltage dimension to the traditional current-only measurement approach, creating a two-dimensional measurement space that provides richer information for state variable determination through the approximation functions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Measurement precision

If multiple sensor values from different times are processed, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestate variable determination accuracyVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary processing of sensor values by storing them in memory and pre-calculating approximation functions, so that when state variable determination is needed, the computation can proceed efficiently with pre-prepared data

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a dynamic evaluation system that adapts the processing of historical sensor values based on the specific state variable being determined, optimizing the balance between using sufficient historical data for accuracy and minimizing processing time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach improves the accuracy of state variable determination, enabling precise control of magnetic actuators with improved precision and flexibility, even in systems without a dedicated sensor system, by utilizing existing voltage and current measurements and preprocessed data.

Implementation Method 1

a movable part, also referred to as an armature, on which a force is generated by energizing a coil

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic force: Lorentz Force

Implementation Method 2

a first sensor value and at least one second sensor value are read in, the first sensor value representing a physical variable identical to that of the second sensor value

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical measurement: Ohm's Law

Data Source

PatentUS11543266B2Method and ascertainment unit for ascertaining a state variable of a magnetic actuator at a particular point in time
Publication Date: 2023.01.03 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US11543266B2 patent drawing
  • US11543266B2 patent drawing
  • US11543266B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for ascertaining a state variable of a magnetic actuator at a particular point in time. The method includes a step of reading in and a step of calculating. In the step of reading in, a first sensor value and at least one second sensor value are read in, the first sensor value representing a physical variable identical to that of the second sensor value, and the first sensor value having been detected after the second sensor value. In the step of calculating, the state variable is calculated using the first sensor value and the second sensor value as input variables to at least one approximation function.