Magnetic Actuator Feedforward Control for Thermal Motor Constant Drift

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing control systems for magnetic actuators in optical systems, particularly in microlithography, fail to accurately compensate for the temperature-dependent reduction in motor constant due to self-heating, leading to positioning inaccuracies and requiring complex temperature measurements and calculations.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a mathematical model that predicts the change in motor constant based on electrical control power, allowing for feedforward correction without explicit temperature measurement, using a model calibrated under operational conditions to adjust the control power accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If temperature sensors and complex calculation systems are installed to compensate for motor constant changes, then positioning accuracy is improved, but device complexity increases and installation space requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning accuracyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical/physical measurement system (temperature sensors, infrared cameras) with a mathematical model-based computational approach. The motor constant change is calculated using a pre-determined mathematical relationship between drive power and motor constant, eliminating the need for physical temperature measurement devices and complex real-time temperature calculations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a virtual model (mathematical model) that replicates the thermal behavior and motor constant characteristics of the actual actuator. This model is calibrated beforehand to copy the relationship between drive power, temperature rise, and motor constant degradation, allowing accurate prediction without physical sensors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Manufacturing precision

If temperature measurements and corrections are implemented, then motor constant compensation is improved, but time delays occur due to slow temperature measurement and calculation processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotor constant compensation accuracyVSAvoidcontrol response time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary calibration to establish the mathematical model relating drive power to motor constant before actual operation. During operation, the correction is calculated immediately using this pre-established relationship, avoiding the time delay associated with real-time temperature measurement and gradual thermal equilibrium calculations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces slow thermal measurement processes with instantaneous mathematical calculations. The mathematical model directly computes motor constant changes from drive power inputs without waiting for thermal sensors to detect temperature changes or for thermal equilibrium to be reached.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Device complexity

If the actuator is controlled without considering motor constant changes, then device complexity is reduced, but positioning accuracy deteriorates due to self-heating effects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system simplicityVSAvoidpositioning accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a mathematical model that copies the thermal and magnetic characteristics of the actuator to predict motor constant degradation. This model is calibrated to replicate the actual physical behavior, enabling accurate compensation while maintaining simple control implementation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the control approach from using a constant motor constant to using a variable motor constant that is dynamically adjusted based on drive power levels. The mathematical model provides correction factors that modify the motor constant parameter according to the actual operating conditions, improving accuracy without complex hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables precise actuator control by anticipating motor constant changes, reducing time delays and simplifying the control system design, thereby improving positioning accuracy and reducing the need for temperature sensors.

Implementation Method 1

When a current flows through the electrical conductor arrangement, a magnetic field is induced, which interacts with the magnetic field of the permanent magnet. This interaction manifests itself, for example, in a mechanical force acting between the electrical conductor arrangement and the permanent magnet.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

The magnitude of the force depends primarily on geometric factors and the strength of the respective magnetic fields. This interaction causes the permanent magnet to heat up.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLorentz force: Lorentz Force

Implementation Method 3

The higher the current, the greater the heating. Due to the heating, the magnetization and thus the magnetic field strength of the permanent magnet decreases, which leads to a reduction in the effective force.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Data Source

PatentEP4133589B1Method, actuating device, optical system and lithography system
Publication Date: 2025.08.06 CARL ZEISS SMT GMBH
  • EP4133589B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4133589B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP4133589B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for operating a magnetic actuator (200), in particular for actuating an optical element (510) in an optical system (500), which is designed to provide a mechanical force (A) as a function of an electrical actuating power (PS), wherein the method comprises: A) determining (S1) a mathematical model of the actuator (200) which describes a change in a motor constant (k) of the actuator (200) as a function of the electrical actuating power (PS) supplied, B) actuating (S2) the actuator (200) with a first electrical actuating power (PS) as a function of to a predetermined target force (FS), C) determining (S3) the change in the motor constant (k) of the actuator (200) on the basis of the actuation of the actuator (200) with the first electrical actuating power (PS) by means of the mathematical model, D) determining (S4) a correction value for the first electrical actuating power (PS) according to the change in the motor constant (k) determined, and E) actuating the actuator (200) with a second electrical actuating power (PS) as a function of the first electrical actuating power (PS) and the correction value determined.