Magnetic Adhesion Robots for Variable-Load Surface Travel

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Robots moving along inclined, vertical, or downwardly-facing surfaces face challenges in maintaining contact due to varying forces and payload weights, requiring dynamic adjustment of magnetic adhesion forces to ensure continuous operation and movement.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a robot system equipped with load sensors and adjustable adhesion magnets that continuously monitor and adjust the magnetic force to maintain a sufficient net force for contact and movement, using a controller to adjust the magnetic force based on real-time force measurements from load sensors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If static magnetic force is used to adhere the robot to the surface, then the device complexity is reduced, but the robot cannot maintain reliable contact when transporting payloads of unknown weights or on varying surfaces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontact maintenanceVSAvoidmagnetic force control system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The magnetic adhesion force is made dynamically adjustable through actuators that change the position of adhesion magnets relative to the surface. The controller modifies the attractive magnetic force in real-time based on load sensor feedback, allowing the robot to adapt to varying payloads and surface conditions while maintaining reliable contact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

A feedback control loop is implemented where load sensors continuously measure the force between the robot and surface, and the controller adjusts the magnetic adhesion force accordingly. This closed-loop system ensures the robot maintains sufficient contact force even when transporting payloads of unknown weights or on varying surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the magnetic adhesion force is increased to ensure contact on all surfaces, then the reliability of contact is improved, but the energy consumption increases and movement becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontact maintenanceVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The magnetic adhesion force is dynamically adjusted to match the actual requirements of the situation. Rather than maintaining a constantly high magnetic force, the controller modulates the force based on real-time load sensor measurements, reducing energy consumption when high adhesion is not needed while ensuring sufficient contact when required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The attractive magnetic force parameter is changed dynamically based on operating conditions. The controller adjusts the magnetic force level according to the measured load and surface conditions, optimizing the balance between maintaining reliable contact and minimizing energy consumption during movement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If the magnetic adhesion force is adjusted dynamically based on load sensor feedback, then the adaptability to varying payloads and surfaces is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepayload accommodationVSAvoidcontrol system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system serves multiple functions: it processes load sensor data, determines appropriate magnetic force levels, controls adhesion magnet actuators, and coordinates with the locomotion system. This multi-functional controller handles various payload weights and surface conditions through a unified control architecture, managing complexity through functional integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The feedback control mechanism provides adaptability to varying payloads and surfaces through continuous monitoring and adjustment. Load sensors detect changes in contact force, and the controller automatically adjusts magnetic adhesion accordingly, enabling the robot to accommodate unknown payload weights and different surface conditions without requiring complex pre-programming or manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Reliability

If load sensors and adjustable adhesion magnets are implemented, then the operational reliability on varying surfaces is improved, but the device complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation on varying surfacesVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates dynamic elements (adjustable adhesion magnets with actuators and load sensors) that enable reliable operation on varying surfaces. While these components increase manufacturing complexity, they provide the necessary adaptability for the robot to maintain contact on inclined, vertical, and downwardly-facing surfaces with payloads of unknown weights.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The robot performs self-adjustment of magnetic adhesion force based on its own sensor measurements. The load sensors detect contact force conditions, and the controller automatically modifies the magnetic force without external intervention, enabling the system to self-regulate and maintain reliable operation across varying surface conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution allows robots to maintain contact and move efficiently along varying surfaces while transporting payloads of unknown weights, enhancing operational reliability and flexibility compared to static magnetic force approaches.

Implementation Method 1

one or more adhesion magnets constructed and arranged to adhere the robot to the surface via an attractive magnetic force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic force: Magnetism

Implementation Method 2

one or more load sensors configured to detect a force between the surface and robot

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForce detection: Force

Data Source

PatentUS11759943B2Robots and systems for automated storage and retrieval
Publication Date: 2023.09.19 FERROMOTION TECH INC
  • US11759943B2 patent drawing
  • US11759943B2 patent drawing
  • US11759943B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Automated storage and retrieval systems which include robots that move along ceilings and/or walls to retrieve and/or transport goods. The robots use magnetic adhesion to hold to the surfaces. The robots adjust the magnetic adhesion force in response to changes in weight or other conditions.