Magnetic Assembly with Segmented Connection Elements

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing magnetic assemblies are limited in creating complex three-dimensional structures as they lack modularity and stability, allowing only vertical extension and requiring precise user positioning of support panels, which are not easily locked together.

Innovation Solution

The magnetic assembly includes support panels with connection elements that have seats for housing ferromagnetic or magnetic elements and a peripheral portion for mechanical coupling to the panel edge, enabling extension in both height and width, with features like interlocking teeth and bayonet-like mechanisms for stability and modularity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If support panels are used to stabilise magnetic structures, then two-dimensional stability is improved, but the ability to create complex three-dimensional structures extending upwards is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetwo-dimensional stabilityVSAvoidability to create complex three-dimensional structures
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The support panel is divided into multiple modular connection elements distributed along its perimeter. Each connection element can independently house and lock magnetic elements, allowing the panel to provide stable support while simultaneously enabling complex three-dimensional structures through strategic placement of multiple connection points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The connection element serves multiple functions: it provides mechanical locking of magnetic elements, enables modular assembly of support panels, and creates stable anchoring points for three-dimensional structures. This multi-functionality resolves the contradiction by making the same component responsible for both stability and versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of manufacture

If base panels with limited seats are used, then manufacturing simplicity is improved, but the ability to extend structures in width is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidability to extend structures in width
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of manufacturing complex multi-directional extension capabilities into a single base panel, the invention segments the extension function into multiple identical connection elements that can be added along the panel perimeter. This maintains manufacturing simplicity while enabling unlimited width extension through modular addition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from vertical stacking (single dimension extension) to horizontal arrangement along the panel perimeter (second dimension extension). Connection elements are distributed around the panel edge, allowing structures to extend in width rather than requiring precise vertical stacking of limited-capacity bases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Area of stationary object

If multiple base panels are placed next to each other for width extension, then structure width is improved, but assembly difficulty and positioning precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructure widthVSAvoidassembly difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple connection elements are merged into a single support panel structure, eliminating the need to assemble separate base panels. The connection elements are integrated along the panel perimeter, providing continuous extension capability without requiring precise positioning of multiple independent panels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The connection elements incorporate self-aligning and self-locking features that automatically guide and secure magnetic elements during assembly. This self-service capability reduces assembly difficulty and minimizes the need for precise user positioning, allowing intuitive construction of wide structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Device complexity

If magnetic elements are used without mechanical locking, then component count is reduced, but structural stability and solidity are lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent countVSAvoidstructural stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges magnetic attraction and mechanical locking into a single integrated connection mechanism. The connection element uses both magnetic force and physical interlocking features (such as protrusions and recesses) to secure elements, providing enhanced stability without significantly increasing overall component complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The connection element combines magnetic material properties with mechanical structural features. This composite approach integrates two different stabilization mechanisms (magnetic and mechanical) into one unified component, achieving superior structural stability while maintaining reasonable device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution allows for the creation of complex, stable three-dimensional structures that are modular and easier to construct, even for less capable users, with reduced reliance on magnetic components and lower production costs.

Implementation Method 1

at least one magnetic element, magnetically couplable to said at least one ferromagnetic element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic coupling: Magnetism

Data Source

PatentUS11247141B2Magnetic assembly
Publication Date: 2022.02.15 PLASTWOOD ITAL SRL
  • US11247141B2 patent drawing
  • US11247141B2 patent drawing
  • US11247141B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a magnetic assembly for creating three-dimensional structures, said magnetic assembly comprising at least one ferromagnetic element (1), at least one magnetic element (2), magnetically couplable to said at least one ferromagnetic element (1), and at least one support panel (3) having a perimeter edge (10). Said magnetic assembly being characterised in that it further comprises at least one connection element (4), said at least one connection element (4) comprising a seat (6) for removably housing and retaining a ferromagnetic element (1) or a magnetic element, and at least one peripheral portion (9) suitable for being removably coupled to at least one portion of the perimeter edge (10) of said support panel (3), becoming locked thereto.