Magnetic Base Body Oxide Control for Insulation and Permeability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Magnetic base bodies formed with metal magnetic grains face challenges in achieving excellent electrical insulating properties due to oxidation reactions and reduced magnetic permeability when using insulating layers, particularly when heat-treated in high oxygen concentration atmospheres.

Innovation Solution

A magnetic base body composed of metal magnetic grains with high Fe and Si content, featuring oxide layers with specific molar ratios of Fe2SiO4 and Fe2O3, formed through degreasing in a low oxygen atmosphere and subsequent heat treatment in an inert atmosphere, to enhance electrical insulation and magnetic properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If insulating layers are formed on metal magnetic grains by heat treatment in high oxygen concentration atmosphere, then electrical insulating property is improved, but magnetic properties deteriorate due to increased oxide content between grains

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical insulating propertyVSAvoidmagnetic properties
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies inert atmosphere heat treatment (using nitrogen or other inert gases) instead of air or high oxygen concentration atmosphere. This prevents excessive oxidation of metal magnetic grains while still forming sufficient insulating oxide layers between grains. The inert environment maintains magnetic properties by limiting oxide formation to only what is necessary for electrical insulation, resolving the contradiction between improving insulating property and maintaining magnetic properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #39Inert atmosphere (Inert environment)

2Power

If metal magnetic grains are used to achieve high current flow, then performance is enhanced, but electrical insulating property deteriorates compared to ferrite materials

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurrent flow capabilityVSAvoidelectrical insulating property
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a composite structure where metal magnetic grains (Fe-Si-Cr alloy) are combined with controlled insulating oxide layers (FeSiO3, Fe2SiO4) formed on grain surfaces and at grain boundaries. This composite approach allows the bulk metal grains to provide high magnetic permeability and current flow capability while the surface oxide layers provide the necessary electrical insulation, thus resolving the contradiction between power capability and insulating property.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by creating different oxidation states at different locations: the interior of metal grains remains highly reduced to maintain magnetic properties, while the surfaces and grain boundaries develop controlled oxide layers for insulation. This spatial differentiation of oxidation states allows simultaneous achievement of high electrical insulation and maintained magnetic performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If oxide content between metal magnetic grains increases, then electrical insulation is improved, but specific magnetic permeability drops

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical insulating propertyVSAvoidspecific magnetic permeability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameters of heat treatment (temperature, time, oxygen partial pressure, inert gas composition) to precisely control the amount and type of oxide formed between grains. By optimizing these parameters, the patent achieves the minimum necessary oxide content for electrical insulation while minimizing the impact on magnetic permeability. The key is maintaining oxide content at threshold levels rather than allowing excessive oxidation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a magnetic base body with improved electrical insulating properties and mechanical strength, maintaining high magnetic permeability while reducing energy loss in coil components.

Implementation Method 1

the components constituting the metal magnetic grains actively undergo oxidation reaction and the amount of oxide between the metal magnetic grains tends to increase

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation reaction: Oxidation

Implementation Method 2

Metal magnetic materials are inferior to ferrite materials in electrical insulating property, so when they are used, in order to obtain a magnetic base body offering sufficient electrical insulating property, oftentimes insulating layers are formed on the surface of grains formed by the metal magnetic materials to electrically insulate the grains from each other

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical insulation: Electrical Resistance

Implementation Method 3

the ratio (IFe2SiO4/IFe) of the strongest diffraction line intensity (IFe2SiO4) observed in a range of 30.8°≤2θ≤32.2° to the strongest diffraction line intensity (IFe) observed in a range of 43.8°≤2θ≤45.2° in X-ray diffraction measurement using the CuKα ray

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-ray diffraction: X-Ray

Data Source

PatentUS11848133B2Magnetic base body, coil component, and circuit board
Publication Date: 2023.12.19 TAIYO YUDEN KK
  • US11848133B2 patent drawing
  • US11848133B2 patent drawing
  • US11848133B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A magnetic base body is constituted by: metal magnetic grains containing Fe, and Si as an optional component, where the total content of the Fe and Si is 99% by mass or higher; and oxide layers present between the metal magnetic grains; wherein the ratio (IFe2SiO4/IFe) of the strongest diffraction line intensity (IFe2SiO4) observed in a range of 30.8°≤2θ≤32.2° to the strongest diffraction line intensity (IFe) observed in a range of 43.8°≤2θ≤45.2° in X-ray diffraction measurement using the CuKα ray is 0.0020 or higher; and the ratio (IFe2O3/IFe) of the strongest diffraction line intensity (IFe2O3) observed in a range of 33.0°≤2θ≤34.4° to the IFe in X-ray diffraction measurement using the CuKα ray is lower than 0.0010.