Magnetic-Contrast Bearing Pointing for Zero-Wear Precision Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing pointing apparatuses, such as those using gimbals and MEMS, face challenges in scalability, weight, wear, and complexity, making them difficult to scale and maintain, especially in applications like optical communication and robotics.

Innovation Solution

The use of magnetic-contrast bearings with a magnetic array and substrate, coupled with drive circuitry, allows for controlled motion and levitation of a pointing structure, enabling precise pointing with minimal power and parts, and is scalable for various applications.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If gimbals and flexures are used for controlled movement, then pointing control is achieved, but the apparatus becomes heavy and wears out over time

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovedurabilityVSAvoidweight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical gimbal and flexure systems with a magnetic-contrast bearing system that uses magnetic fields for levitation and control. This substitution eliminates mechanical contact and wear while reducing weight, as the pointing structure levitates without mechanical support structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a magnetic field as an intermediary between the bearing structure and the pointing structure. The magnetic field mediates the control forces, allowing contactless actuation and levitation, which eliminates mechanical wear and reduces the need for heavy mechanical support components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If gimbals and flexures are used for controlled movement, then pointing control is achieved, but the apparatus is difficult to scale

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovescalabilityVSAvoidcomplexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The magnetic-contrast bearing system serves multiple functions within a single integrated structure: it provides levitation, positioning control, and scaling capability. The planar array configuration allows the same basic structure to be scaled to different sizes and applications without requiring fundamentally different mechanical designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If magnetic-contrast bearing is used, then wear is eliminated and scalability is improved, but magnetic field control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvezero wearVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The magnetic array is segmented into multiple independent elements arranged in a planar configuration. Each element can be controlled independently through drive circuitry, allowing complex pointing motions to be achieved through coordinated control of simpler individual magnetic elements. This segmentation makes the control system more manageable and scalable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution provides high-precision, low-power, and durable pointing with zero wear and minimal mechanical complexity, suitable for applications like optical communication and robotics, with the ability to maintain stability in reduced or no power modes.

Implementation Method 1

The drive circuitry generates a magnetic field that interacts with the magnetic array and causes control of a pointing position of the pointing structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field interaction: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 2

The substrate, in specific embodiments, repels the magnetic array and causes passive levitation of the pointing structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic levitation: Maglev

Implementation Method 3

The substrate is formed with a diamagnetic material that repels the magnetic array and causes passive levitation of the pointing structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiamagnetism: Diamagnetism

Implementation Method 4

In the case of levitation with magnetic fluids, the liquid is magnetically attracted to the magnet array more than the lower-susceptibility substrate. The liquid can exert magnetic-induced hydrodynamic forces to push the substrate away

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic fluid attraction: Ferrofluid

Data Source

PatentUS11835711B2Pointing apparatuses and methods involving magnetic-contrast bearings
Publication Date: 2023.12.05 SRI INTERNATIONAL
  • US11835711B2 patent drawing
  • US11835711B2 patent drawing
  • US11835711B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An example apparatus includes a pointing structure, a magnetic-contrast bearing, and drive circuitry. The magnetic-contrast bearing is coupled to the pointing structure, and includes a magnetic array and a substrate that is arranged with the magnetic array. The drive circuitry generates a magnetic field that interacts with the magnetic array and causes control of a pointing position of the pointing structure.