Magnetic Broadhead Blade Retainer for Reliable Deployment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current mechanical broadheads with expandable blades suffer from kinetic energy loss and reliability issues due to complex retention mechanisms, leading to reduced lethality and accuracy in hunting, as they require external fasteners and are prone to malfunction.

Innovation Solution

A magnetic blade retainer system where a powerful magnet within the broadhead tip securely holds blades in a compressed position during flight, allowing them to deploy radially upon impact without external retainers, using actuating spikes to overcome magnetic forces and maximize energy transfer.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If pins, elastics, gages, rubberbands, or other retaining mechanisms are used to operably couple the blade to the body, then the blade can be retained during nocking and flight, but the device complexity increases and reliability decreases due to additional parts that can be damaged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade retention reliabilityVSAvoidretention mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes all traditional retaining mechanisms (pins, elastics, gages, rubberbands) from the broadhead design. Instead, the blade is retained solely by magnetic attraction between the magnet embedded in the blade and the ferromagnetic material in the broadhead body, eliminating complex retention mechanisms and improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces mechanical retention systems with a magnetic field-based retention system. The magnet in the blade creates magnetic attraction to ferromagnetic material in the body, substituting mechanical fasteners with a field-based solution that has no moving parts to fail.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Loss of energy

If blades rotate from a retracted position to a deployed position about a rearward pivot point, then the cutting edge can be exposed, but kinetic energy is lost to the blade rotating opposite to the flight path

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvekinetic energy lossVSAvoidblade deployment mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of rotating the blade about a rearward pivot point (which creates energy loss), the patent inverts the deployment mechanism: the blade slides forward along the longitudinal axis in the same direction as flight, with the cutting edge exposing radially outward. This inversion eliminates energy-wasting rotation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a dynamic sliding mechanism where the blade moves linearly forward within the body along guided channels. The blade transitions from a retracted position (aligned with the body) to a deployed position (extended radially outward) through controlled linear motion rather than rotation, optimizing energy transfer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If blades are held by magnetic attraction to a magnet, then the part count is minimized and reliability is improved, but the blade must be made of ferromagnetic material which may limit blade material options

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveretention mechanism part countVSAvoidblade material selection
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the blade serve multiple functions: it acts as both the cutting element and the magnetic retainer component. The ferromagnetic material in the blade serves dual purposes: providing structural integrity for cutting while also enabling magnetic attraction to the magnet, eliminating the need for separate retention mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution ensures reliable deployment of blades with minimized part count, reduced noise, and increased cutting diameter, enhancing hunting effectiveness by maintaining kinetic energy for lethal impact and accuracy.

Implementation Method 1

a magnet is disposed in the broadhead tip resulting in the blade being securely held to the magnet by the magnetic attraction of the flat blade end to the magnet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic attraction: Magnetism

Implementation Method 2

using actuating spikes to overcome magnetic forces and maximize energy transfer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact force: Impact Force

Data Source

PatentUS9329006B1Magnetic blade retainer for a broadhead
Publication Date: 2016.05.03 ROGUE HUNTING PROD INC
  • US9329006B1 patent drawing
  • US9329006B1 patent drawing
  • US9329006B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A magnetic blade retainer for an expandable broadhead utilizing the properties of magnetic attraction to reliably secure a plurality of blades completely within respective blade channels so that an expandable broadhead may closely resemble the flight properties of a practice arrow tip yet lethally expand upon impact with a target. Extraneous parts are eliminated, but a strong, disc magnet is inset or integrated into the forward portion of a broadhead tip assembly. Each blade is provided with a magnetic, flat forward end. The interaction of the flat forward end and the magnet magnetically retain each blade. The magnetic bond is broken when the arrow penetrates a target. An actuating spike further transfers the impact energy to each blade. The forces on the actuating spike then drag each blade backward and each blade extends as the rearward forces are translated by the wedging surface near the end of the channel.