Device for stabilizing one or more objects, in particular containers, and combination comprising at least one container and such a device

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing container stabilization methods using magnets either provide insufficient stabilization or require excessive force to detach, failing to account for the varying lifting abilities of individuals, particularly children and the elderly.

Innovation Solution

A device with a base body featuring different magnetic forces on opposite surfaces, allowing adjustment by rotation to match the user's lifting strength, and incorporating movable or offset magnets to vary magnetic interaction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a magnet unit exerts a strong magnetic force to stabilize the container, then the stabilization effect is improved, but the force required to detach the container increases excessively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestabilization effectVSAvoiddetachment force
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The magnet unit is designed to rotate together with the base body, changing its orientation relative to the support body. This dynamic adjustment allows the magnetic force vector to be redirected, reducing the detachment force while maintaining stabilization effect. The magnet unit's rotational movement transforms the magnetic interaction from a fixed strong attraction to a controllable force that can be optimized for both stabilization and easy removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The orientation angle of the magnet unit relative to the support body is changed by rotating the base body. This parameter change allows optimization of the magnetic force components: when stabilized, the magnetic force acts perpendicular to the support body providing strong attraction; when detachment is needed, the base body is rotated to change the angle, reducing the effective magnetic force component that must be overcome.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the magnetic force is increased to prevent tipping, then stability is improved, but it becomes difficult for children and elderly to detach the container

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanti-tipping stabilityVSAvoiddetachability for users with limited strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from a static magnetic connection to a dynamic one where the magnet unit rotates with the base body. This allows the magnetic force to be optimized for stabilization during use, while enabling easy detachment when needed by users with limited strength. The rotational degree of freedom provides a mechanical advantage that reduces the force required for detachment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The rotating base body acts as an intermediary mechanism between the user and the magnetic connection. By rotating the base body, the user can change the orientation of the magnet unit, thereby modulating the magnetic force interaction. This intermediary mechanism allows users with limited strength to control the stabilization and detachment process without directly overcoming the full magnetic force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If a single fixed magnetic force is used, then the device structure is simple, but it cannot adapt to different user strengths and requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnet unit configurationVSAvoidadaptability to different user strengths
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using multiple fixed magnetic force options or complex adjustable mechanisms, the invention employs a single magnet unit that can rotate dynamically. This simple configuration provides adaptability through motion: the magnet unit rotates to different orientations depending on whether stabilization or detachment is needed, eliminating the need for multiple magnets or complex adjustment mechanisms while maintaining versatility for different user strengths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Provides adjustable magnetic stabilization suitable for varying user strengths, preventing container tipping while ensuring easy detachment, and allowing customization for individual needs.

Implementation Method 1

the magnet unit is designed such that it exerts a first magnetic force on the support body at the first surface and a second magnetic force on the second surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic force: Magnetism

Data Source

PatentEP4623762A1Device for stabilizing one or more objects, in particular containers, and combination comprising at least one container and such a device
Publication Date: 2025.10.01 ZIER JENNY
  • EP4623762A1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP4623762A1 patent drawingFigure 1C~1D
  • EP4623762A1 patent drawingFigure 2A~3B

AI summary

Device (14) for stabilizing one or more objects (12), comprising a flat base body (16) with a first surface (18) and a second surface (20), and at least one magnet unit (26) arranged in the base body (16), which magnet unit interacts with the support body (34) to stabilize the object (12) placed on the first surface (18) or second surface (20), wherein the magnet unit (26) is designed such that it exerts a first magnetic force on the support body (34) at the first surface (18) and a second magnetic force on the second surface (20), wherein the first magnetic force and the second magnetic force are of different magnitudes.