Magnetic Control Rod Drive Mechanism for Nuclear Reactors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional control rod drives in nuclear reactors face challenges due to direct mechanical contact with the reactor pressure boundary, leading to issues like corrosion, thermal cycling, and potential coolant leakage, which result in high-failure points and maintenance difficulties over extended operation periods.

Innovation Solution

A control rod drive mechanism that minimizes direct contact with the reactor pressure boundary by using a magnetically levitated system with induction coils and overtravel latches, allowing for linear movement of control elements without mechanical linkages within the isolation barrier, and employing a closed coolant loop to maintain the coils in a vacuum environment, reducing thermal interactions and enhancing structural integrity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If direct mechanical contact with reactor pressure boundary is used, then control rod drive mechanism can be simple and reliable, but corrosion, thermal cycling, and coolant leakage issues occur leading to high failure points and maintenance difficulties

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol rod drive reliabilityVSAvoidcorrosion, thermal cycling, coolant leakage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the conventional mechanical contact system with a magnetic field-based induction system. Induction coils generate magnetic fields that induce currents in conductive control rod components, providing contactless actuation. This eliminates direct mechanical contact between drive mechanism components and the reactor pressure boundary, thereby preventing corrosion, thermal cycling damage, and coolant leakage while maintaining reliable control rod operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces magnetic fields as an intermediary between the drive mechanism and control rods. Induction coils outside the pressure boundary generate magnetic fields that penetrate through the boundary to induce motion in control rod components without requiring physical contact. This magnetic intermediary transfers energy and motion while isolating the drive mechanism from harmful environmental factors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If induction coils are used to move control elements magnetically, then thermal cycling and corrosion are reduced, but device complexity increases with vacuum environment and coolant loop requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal cycling, corrosionVSAvoidvacuum environment, coolant loop
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the system into distinct environmental zones separated by the reactor pressure boundary. The induction coils and drive mechanism operate in a controlled vacuum environment outside the boundary, while control rods operate inside the reactor. This segmentation allows each subsystem to be optimized for its specific environment, with the vacuum environment protecting sensitive electrical components and the pressure boundary providing thermal and chemical isolation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a vacuum environment around the induction coils and drive mechanism, which serves as an inert atmosphere free from oxygen and moisture that cause corrosion. The vacuum also provides thermal isolation, reducing thermal cycling effects. This controlled inert environment significantly extends component life and reduces maintenance requirements despite the added complexity of vacuum containment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #39Inert atmosphere (Inert environment)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If mechanical linkages are eliminated from isolation barrier, then coolant leakage risks are reduced, but achieving linear movement without mechanical contact becomes complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoolant leakageVSAvoidcontactless linear movement mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical linkages that would penetrate the isolation barrier with a magnetic field-based induction system. Induction coils generate time-varying magnetic fields that induce eddy currents in conductive portions of the control rod assembly, creating electromagnetic forces that produce linear motion without any physical connection across the pressure boundary. This eliminates coolant leakage paths while achieving the required control rod movement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs periodic alternation of magnetic field polarity in the induction coils to achieve bidirectional linear movement of control rods. By sequentially energizing different coil sets with alternating polarity, the system creates oscillating electromagnetic forces that can precisely control the position and direction of control rod movement without mechanical contact, enabling complex motion sequences through simple periodic field variations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution reduces thermal cycling, minimizes corrosion and hydrogen deflagration risks, and enables reliable, long-term operation with reduced maintenance needs by maintaining the control rod drive components in a vacuum environment, enhancing reactor safety and efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

linearly moving the induction coils to linearly drive the magnets

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

move the control element via a magnet immovably connected to the same

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic force: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 3

A closed coolant loop may cool the induction coils

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Data Source

PatentUS11728050B2Methods of moving an induction coil to move a control element in a nuclear reactor
Publication Date: 2023.08.15 GE HITACHI NUCLEAR ENERGY AMERICAS LLC
  • US11728050B2 patent drawing
  • US11728050B2 patent drawing
  • US11728050B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Control rod drives include linearly-moveable control elements inside an isolation barrier. Control rod drives move the control element through secured magnetic elements subject to magnetic fields. Induction coils may generate magnetic fields and be moveable across a full stroke length of the control element in the reactor. A motor may spin a linear screw to move the induction coils on a vertical travel nut. A control rod assembly may house the magnetic elements and directly, removably join to the control element. The control rod assembly may lock with magnetic overtravel latches inside the isolation barrier to maintain an overtravel position. Overtravel release coils outside the isolation barrier may release the latches to leave the overtravel position. Operation includes moving the induction coils with a linear screw to drive the control element to desired insertion points, including full insertion by gravity following de-energization. No direct connection may penetrate the isolation barrier.