Magnetic Core Composition for Vehicle Power Electronics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Magnetic cores used in vehicle power electronics face challenges in reliability, particularly in low-temperature characteristics and thermal shock, and have limitations in heat dissipation due to their slimmed size and surface area, leading to increased heat generation and loss.

Innovation Solution

A magnetic core composition including 37-44 mol% manganese, 9-16 mol% zinc, 42-52 mol% iron, with added cobalt and nickel as magnetic additives, and silicon, calcium, tantalum, vanadium, or zirconium as non-magnetic additives, which are strategically distributed at grain boundaries to enhance permeability and reduce core loss, and are manufactured using a post-addition process to optimize their properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If magnetic core size is reduced to achieve slimming, then device compactness is improved, but heat dissipation capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnetic core sizeVSAvoidheat dissipation
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material composition parameters by adding specific elements (Co: 0.1-1.0 wt%, Ni: 0.1-0.5 wt%, and non-magnetic additives totaling 0.03-0.15 wt%) to the magnetic core formula. This modifies the material's intrinsic heat dissipation properties, allowing smaller cores to maintain adequate thermal performance through improved material characteristics rather than relying solely on size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If conventional magnetic core composition is used, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but reliability under thermal shock and low-temperature conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing processVSAvoidthermal shock and low-temperature characteristics
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by strategically distributing non-magnetic additives specifically at grain boundaries rather than uniformly throughout the material. This localized addition enhances reliability at critical interfaces where thermal stress concentrates, while maintaining overall manufacturing simplicity through a straightforward composition specification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite magnetic material system combining multiple elements (Fe, Mn, Zn, Co, Ni) with non-magnetic additives (Si, Ca, Ta, V, Zr). This composite approach leverages the synergistic effects of different elements to achieve superior thermal shock and low-temperature reliability while maintaining a relatively simple manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If magnetic additive content is increased to improve permeability, then magnetic performance is improved, but core loss increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovepermeabilityVSAvoidcore loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the balance between magnetic additives and non-magnetic additives, specifying precise concentration ranges (Co: 0.1-1.0 wt%, Ni: 0.1-0.5 wt%, non-magnetic additives: 0.03-0.15 wt%). This parameter optimization achieves the dual goal of maintaining high permeability (2900 or more) while controlling core loss (500 mW/cm³ or less) by preventing excessive magnetic additive accumulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The non-magnetic additives act as intermediaries that mediate between the magnetic additives and the base magnetic material. By positioning non-magnetic elements at grain boundaries, they enable the magnetic additives (Co, Ni) to enhance permeability while the non-magnetic additives prevent excessive core loss by controlling magnetic domain interactions at grain boundaries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The magnetic core exhibits improved reliability with reduced permeability decrease and core loss increase under various environmental stressors, including temperature changes, vibrations, and impact, while maintaining high breaking load, thus meeting stringent vehicle reliability standards like AEC-Q200.

Implementation Method 1

a magnetic core including 37 to 44 mol % of manganese (Mn), 9 to 16 mol % of zinc (Zn), 42 to 52 mol % of iron (Fe), a magnetic additive and a non-magnetic additive

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFerromagnetism: Ferromagnetism

Data Source

PatentUS11631519B2Magnetic core
Publication Date: 2023.04.18 LG INNOTEK CO LTD
  • US11631519B2 patent drawing
  • US11631519B2 patent drawing
  • US11631519B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a magnetic core having improved reliability. The magnetic core includes 37 to 44 mol % of manganese (Mn), 9 to 16 mol % of zinc (Zn), 42 to 52 mol % of iron (Fe), a magnetic additive, and a non-magnetic additive, wherein the magnetic core has a permeability of 2,900 or more and a core loss of 500 mW/cm3 or less.