Adjustable Magnetic Counterbalance for Constant Linear Force

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current counterbalance technologies lack practical and cost-effective solutions for applying constant forces to objects, particularly in applications requiring precise control and adjustment of forces for linear motion systems.

Innovation Solution

The development of passive magnetic counterbalances that adjust force by varying the spacing and interaction area between magnetic poles, allowing for customizable force application through adjustable gaps and pole alignments, enabling efficient counterbalancing in linear motion systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If traditional counterbalance mechanisms are used, then constant force can be applied to objects, but the device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconstant force applicationVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical counterbalance systems (springs, weights, pulleys) with a magnetic field-based system using permanent magnets. The magnetic interaction between opposing magnet arrays generates the constant force, eliminating complex mechanical components while maintaining the force application function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The magnetic counterbalance system is passive and self-regulating. The permanent magnets inherently generate the magnetic field required for force application without external power sources or active control systems. The system automatically maintains constant force through the magnetic interaction geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If fixed counterbalance force is applied, then simple device structure is maintained, but adaptability to varying loads is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce adjustment capabilityVSAvoidadjustment mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces adjustable elements that allow the counterbalance system to dynamically adapt to different load requirements. The magnet arrays can be repositioned or reconfigured to change the magnetic interaction geometry, thereby adjusting the generated force while maintaining a relatively simple overall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows adjustment of key parameters such as the gap distance between magnet arrays, the alignment of magnetic poles, and potentially the magnet strength configuration. These parameter changes enable force adaptation without requiring a complete redesign of the counterbalance mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Force

If magnetic poles are closely spaced to increase force, then force magnitude increases, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce magnitudeVSAvoidpole spacing precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses arrays of multiple magnets rather than relying on extreme close-spacing of individual poles. By distributing the force generation across multiple magnetic elements, the system achieves high total force while maintaining tolerable spacing between individual magnets, reducing manufacturing precision requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple magnetic poles into arrays that work together to generate the total required force. The collective action of multiple magnets at moderate spacing produces the same or greater force than would be needed from single closely-spaced poles, thereby reducing the stringency of manufacturing precision requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution provides a reliable and cost-effective means to maintain a substantially constant force along a linear axis, effectively counterbalancing loads and reducing the load on linear actuators, while allowing for precise adjustment of forces to accommodate varying loads.

Implementation Method 1

The first and second parts each comprise one or more permanent magnets arranged to provide one or more magnetic poles... the interaction of the magnetic fields of the permanent magnets of the first and second parts causes the first part to be forced toward or away from the second part

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field interaction: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 2

The magnetic poles of the first part and the second part are arranged facing one another, spaced apart by a gap... This arrangement allows the interaction of the magnetic fields of the permanent magnets to cause the first part to be forced toward or away from the second part

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic force: Lorentz Force

Data Source

PatentUS11915863B2Adjustable magnetic counterbalance
Publication Date: 2024.02.27 ZABER TECH INC
  • US11915863B2 patent drawing
  • US11915863B2 patent drawing
  • US11915863B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A passive magnetic constant-force apparatus comprises a geometry and arrangement of permanent magnets, ferromagnetic components, and non-magnetic structural components. The apparatus is easily and precisely adjustable, cost-effective, with a high load capacity, and with minimal parasitic forces. The apparatus is suitable for use as a counterbalance for vertical linear motion applications and may be integrated with or attached to a linear motion stage.