Magnetic Counterweight Fixture for Precise Device Weight Simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing testing methods for computing device assemblies face challenges in accurately simulating weight distribution due to the time-consuming search for counterweights, improper weight adjustments, and unstable fixation, which can lead to inaccurate test results, and existing systems often fail to address these issues.

Innovation Solution

A counterweight fixture system comprising a counterweight block, base, and magnet, designed for quick and stable attachment to a frame, allowing for precise simulation of weight distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If stacks of components such as screws, steel plates, scrap materials are used to simulate weight, then the cost is reduced and damage potential is minimized, but the testing process becomes time-consuming and the weight distribution accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecost reduction and damage preventionVSAvoidtime to find counterweight, adjust weight, and fix position
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The counterweight is divided into multiple adjustable blocks that can be individually positioned and secured at different locations along the rail, allowing precise weight distribution adjustment without requiring custom fabrication for each test scenario

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The fixture provides a universal solution by using standardized components (base, rail, counterweight blocks, securing mechanisms) that can be configured for various testing scenarios, eliminating the need to search for different counterweight objects for each test

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of manufacture

If stacks of components are used to simulate weight, then cost is reduced, but the manufacturing precision and weight distribution accuracy deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecost reductionVSAvoidweight distribution accuracy and center of gravity alignment
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The fixture allows different sections of the counterweight system to have different properties - counterweight blocks can be positioned at specific locations along the rail to precisely control the center of gravity, and securing mechanisms can be placed at optimal positions to ensure stable fixation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static, fixed counterweight stacks to a dynamic configuration where counterweight blocks can be moved, positioned, and secured at various locations to precisely match the actual center of gravity of the computing device assembly being tested

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If manual positioning and securing of counterweights is performed, then flexibility is maintained, but the stability and precision of fixation deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in weight adjustmentVSAvoidstable fixation and precise positioning
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The fixture incorporates pre-designed securing mechanisms (such as clamps, locks, or fastening devices) that are built into the base and rail structure, providing stable fixation before testing begins and preventing movement during testing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual, imprecise positioning with a structured mechanical system featuring rails, guided counterweight blocks, and securing mechanisms that provide both flexibility in positioning and reliability in fixation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The counterweight fixture system provides rapid, accurate, and stable simulation of weight distribution, ensuring precise testing of computing device assemblies by adjusting to desired load areas and centers of gravity.

Implementation Method 1

The at least one magnet is securely embedded in a respective one of the at least one opening of the bottom of the base

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic attraction: Magnetism

Data Source

PatentUS20260004816A1Counterweight fixture
Publication Date: 2026.01.01 QUANTA COMPUTER INC
  • US20260004816A1 patent drawing
  • US20260004816A1 patent drawing
  • US20260004816A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A counterweight fixture for simulating weight of a computing device includes at least one counterweight block, a base, and at least one magnet. The counterweight block is configured to be placed on and secured to the base. The base includes a bottom and at least one wall extending from the bottom. The bottom of the base forms at least one opening on an opposite side of the at least one wall. The at least one magnet is securely embedded in a respective one of the at least one opening of the bottom of the base.