Magnetic Vivarium Stand Cover for Tool-Free Cable Routing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vivarium stands, particularly those for aquariums, face challenges in providing a visually pleasing and simple method to manage electrical supply lines and water infeed/discharge lines, as conventional solutions often require additional fixtures that complicate handling and aesthetics.

Innovation Solution

A stand design featuring side walls with cutouts and magnet closure elements that securely hold a cover in place using magnetic forces, eliminating the need for hinges or limiting stops, allowing for easy insertion and removal of cables without tools and maintaining a clear, visually appealing appearance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional fixtures such as hinges and limiting stops are used to secure the cover, then the cover can be reliably held in the cutout, but the device complexity increases and the visual appearance is impaired

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecover retentionVSAvoidnumber of fixtures
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical fixtures (hinges, limiting stops) with a magnetic closure system. Magnets embedded in the stand body and corresponding magnetic elements in the cover create secure retention through magnetic attraction, eliminating the need for complex mechanical assemblies while maintaining reliable cover holding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention extracts and removes unnecessary fixtures from the design. By using magnetic forces, the patent eliminates hinges, limiting stops, and other mechanical fastening elements, simplifying the overall structure and improving visual appearance while maintaining functional requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If conventional fixtures are used to secure the cover, then the cover can be held in place, but the ease of operation deteriorates due to requiring tools for installation and removal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecover retentionVSAvoidtool-free installation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The magnetic closure system replaces mechanical fastening mechanisms that require tools for assembly and disassembly. The magnetic attraction force allows the cover to be easily attached and removed by hand, significantly improving ease of operation while maintaining secure retention during use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The magnetic closure system enables self-service installation and removal. The cover can be easily attached and detached without requiring external tools or complex manipulation, making the operation intuitive and user-friendly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If additional fixtures are installed in the cutout, then the cover can be secured, but the cable passage is impaired by fixtures in the cutout

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecover retentionVSAvoidcable passage clearance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

By replacing mechanical fixtures with magnetic fields, the cutout remains free of physical obstructions. Magnets embedded in the stand body do not protrude into the cutout space, maintaining clear cable passage while providing secure cover retention through magnetic attraction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The magnetic retention force acts perpendicular to the cutout plane, while the cable passage requires clearance parallel to the cutout plane. This dimensional separation allows magnetic fixtures to provide retention without interfering with cable routing through the cutout.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Reliability

If the stand is produced with additional fixtures, then the cover can be securely held, but the ease of manufacture deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecover retentionVSAvoidproduction simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and eliminates complex mechanical fixtures from the manufacturing process. Magnetic elements can be embedded directly into molded plastic components or mounted with simple adhesives, significantly simplifying manufacturing compared to assembling multiple mechanical parts such as hinges and limiting stops.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The magnetic closure elements are integrated into the stand body and cover as unified components. This merging of functions into fewer parts reduces the number of manufacturing steps, assembly operations, and quality control checkpoints, improving ease of manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The magnetic closure system simplifies cable management, enhances handling, and provides a clean, aesthetically pleasing design by allowing for tool-free operation and secure cable passage without additional fixtures, improving both functionality and appearance.

Implementation Method 1

In the installed position, the cover is held exclusively by magnetic forces acting between the first magnet closure element and the second magnet closure element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic forces: Magnetism

Data Source

PatentUS12121148B2Vivarium stand
Publication Date: 2024.10.22 OASE GMBH
  • US12121148B2 patent drawing
  • US12121148B2 patent drawing
  • US12121148B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A stand for a vivarium has a side wall with a cutout and at least one first magnet closure element arranged adjacent to the cutout. At least one cover is provided that is to be inserted into the cutout and at least partially covers the cutout in an installed position of the at least one cover in the cutout. The at least one cover has at least one second magnet closure element that in the installed position is arranged so as to correspond with the at least one first magnet closure element so that the at least one cover is secured in the cutout exclusively by magnetic forces interacting between the at least one first magnet closure element and the at least one second magnet closure element in the installed position.