Magnetic Disk Read Offset Correction for Shingled Tracks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Magnetic disk devices face challenges in efficiently recording and reading data due to the need for precise head positioning and large recording capacities to manage write and read processing errors across all tracks of the disk, particularly in shingled magnetic recording where tracks are written in a partially overlapping manner.

Innovation Solution

The magnetic disk device employs a system that calculates and records adjustment and correction read offset amounts based on write offset data, allowing the read head to adjust its position to optimize data retrieval by halving the sum of front and object write offset amounts, thereby improving read performance and reducing overhead.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the path of the head at the time of write processing is recorded in a memory to improve error rate, then read performance is improved, but huge recording capacity is required to record paths of the head in all write processing corresponding to all tracks of the disk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror rateVSAvoidrecording capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by selectively recording correction read offset amounts only for specific sectors where write offset amounts exceed a threshold value, rather than recording data for all sectors uniformly. This localized approach reduces the overall recording capacity requirement while maintaining reliability improvement where it is most needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial action by recording correction data only for sectors that require it (those with write offset amounts greater than a threshold), rather than recording for all sectors. This partial recording approach reduces the burden on recording capacity while still improving read performance for the necessary sectors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Productivity

If correction read offset amounts are recorded for all sectors, then read performance is improved, but read processing overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveread performanceVSAvoidread processing overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent reduces read processing overhead by applying local quality - it only retrieves and applies correction read offset amounts for sectors where they exist (those where write offset exceeded the threshold), rather than processing all sectors uniformly. This selective approach minimizes the computational overhead while maintaining read performance benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial action in the read processing stage by only performing correction lookups and applications for sectors that have correction data, rather than processing every sector. This reduces the average read processing overhead while maintaining improved read performance for the sectors that require correction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If precise head positioning is maintained for all tracks, then data integrity is ensured, but the complexity of positioning control increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata integrityVSAvoidpositioning control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality to positioning control by only applying correction read offset amounts for sectors where the write offset exceeded a threshold value. This selective correction approach maintains data integrity for problematic sectors while reducing the overall complexity of positioning control compared to applying corrections uniformly across all sectors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11335366B2Magnetic disk device and read processing method
Publication Date: 2022.05.17 KK TOSHIBA
  • US11335366B2 patent drawing
  • US11335366B2 patent drawing
  • US11335366B2 patent drawing

AI summary

According to one embodiment, a magnetic disk device includes a disk including a first sector arranged at a first radial position deviated from a target position in a radial direction by a first offset amount larger than a first threshold value, a head that writes data to the disk and reads data from the disk, and a controller that reads the first sector by arranging the head at a second radial position deviated from the target position by a second offset amount different from the first offset amount.