Magnetic Feeder Closure for Selective Wild Pig Access

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Invasive wild pigs are causing extensive damage, and existing feeders fail to selectively limit access to non-target species like white-tailed deer and birds, while dominance issues in group feeding behaviors reduce the effectiveness of feeding wild pigs.

Innovation Solution

A feeder with a pivotable closure that can be urged by target animals to open, offering sufficient resistance to prevent non-target animals from accessing the bait, utilizing magnetic interengagement, bistable mechanisms, and adjustable locking systems to ensure exclusive access by wild pigs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the closure offers high resistance to prevent non-target animals from accessing bait, then selectivity is improved, but it becomes difficult for target animals (wild pigs) to open the feeder

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveselectivityVSAvoidaccessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The magnetic engagement force is carefully calibrated to fall within a specific range that non-target animals cannot overcome, yet target animals (wild pigs) can easily exceed due to their superior strength. This parameter optimization resolves the contradiction by making the same closure mechanism both highly selective and easily operable by the intended target.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The magnetic closure acts as an intermediary mechanism that mediates between the need for high security (preventing non-target access) and ease of operation (allowing target access). The magnetic field serves as the mediating force that can be tuned to respond differently to animals of varying strengths, simultaneously achieving both selectivity and accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If the closure is designed to be easily opened by wild pigs, then accessibility is improved, but non-target animals may also access the bait

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveaccessibilityVSAvoidselectivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

By adjusting the magnetic engagement parameters to a specific force range, the closure becomes easily operable for strong target animals while maintaining high resistance against weaker non-target animals. This parameter tuning ensures that accessibility and selectivity are both optimized simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The magnetic closure provides dynamic resistance that adapts to the strength of the animal attempting to open it. For target animals with sufficient strength, the closure opens easily; for non-target animals with insufficient strength, the magnetic force maintains secure engagement. This dynamic response resolves the contradiction between accessibility and selectivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If a simple closure mechanism is used, then device complexity is reduced, but it cannot provide sufficient resistance to prevent non-target species access

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanism simplicityVSAvoidselectivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical locking mechanisms with a magnetic engagement system. This substitution maintains structural simplicity while achieving superior selectivity, as the magnetic force can be precisely calibrated to respond to the strength characteristics of different animal species without requiring complex mechanical components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of increasing mechanical complexity, the solution changes the physical parameter of magnetic engagement force to achieve the desired selectivity. This parameter-based approach maintains device simplicity while providing reliable prevention of non-target access.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The feeder effectively limits access to non-target species and addresses dominance issues in wild pigs, allowing multiple pigs to feed simultaneously while ensuring that only wild pigs can open the feeder, thereby controlling the spread of invasive wild pigs.

Implementation Method 1

The apparatus may be configured such that the trough and closure interengage magnetically, whereby the closure offers said resistance, when the closure is in the closed position. One of the trough and closure may comprise at least one magnetic portion and the other of the trough and closure may comprise at least one magnetically engageable portion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic engagement: Magnetism

Data Source

PatentUS12144325B2Selectively-accessible feeder
Publication Date: 2024.11.19 ANIMAL CONTROL TECH (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD
  • US12144325B2 patent drawing
  • US12144325B2 patent drawing
  • US12144325B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus for baiting and/or feeding target animals comprises: a trough to contain bait and/or feed; and a closure which can be urged by at least one said target animal so as to move from a closed position, in which it precludes access to the bait and/or feed by the target animal(s), to an open position, which is such that said access is enabled, the apparatus being configured such that the closure offers a resistance to being moved which is sufficient that it cannot be urged by another animal to move from the closed position to the open position.