Magnetic Field Modeling Using Local Dipole Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for modeling magnetic fields generated by radiators in medical procedures are computationally heavy due to the need to account for deviations from simple dipole models, leading to errors in tracking objects within the body.

Innovation Solution

A method that assumes radiators behave as simple dipoles with dipole moments varying by location, allowing for simplified computation of magnetic fields by calculating averages of dipole moments at vertices within a volume, resulting in an efficient, fast, and accurate model of the magnetic field.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If complex mathematical procedures (spherical harmonics) are used to account for radiator deviations, then measurement precision is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnetic field modeling accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The volume is divided into multiple smaller sub-volumes, and the magnetic field is calculated separately for each sub-volume using simple dipole assumptions. This segmentation allows the use of computationally simple local models while achieving accurate global field representation through aggregation of multiple local calculations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using complex spherical harmonics to model the entire radiator system, the patent creates simplified dipole moment copies at each vertex that replicate the magnetic field effect. These dipole copies are computationally much simpler than the original complex radiator model but produce equivalent field values at measurement points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Productivity

If simple dipole model is used for radiators, then computational speed is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational speedVSAvoidmagnetic field modeling accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different modeling approaches at different locations: simple dipole models are used at each local vertex position, while the overall system behavior is captured by aggregating contributions from all vertices. This local quality approach allows computationally simple local calculations to combine into an accurate global representation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from modeling the radiators directly in global coordinates to representing the field through dipole moments defined at discrete vertex positions throughout the volume. This dimensional transformation from continuous radiator modeling to discrete vertex-based dipole representation enables both computational efficiency and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach provides a continuous and accurate magnetic field model without reducing accuracy, enabling precise tracking of objects within the body during medical procedures.

Implementation Method 1

generating a magnetic field in a region from a first magnetic field radiator located at a first position and a second magnetic field radiator located at a second position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field generation: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

the first magnetic field radiator and the second magnetic field radiator respectively transmit a first alternating magnetic field at a first frequency and a second alternating magnetic field at a second frequency different from the first frequency

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAlternating magnetic field transmission: Alternating Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 3

measuring respective values of the magnetic field at the multiplicity of vertices

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field measurement: Magnetometer

Implementation Method 4

in response to the respective values, assigning respective first dipole moments to the first magnetic field radiator and assigning respective second dipole moments to the second magnetic field radiator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDipole moment assignment: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 5

calculating the value of the magnetic field includes the first and second magnetic radiators operating as simple dipoles having poles obeying an inverse square law

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInverse square law:

Implementation Method 6

the first and second averages are respective linear weighted averages calculated in terms of a location of the point within the volume

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLinear weighted averaging:

Data Source

PatentUS10213133B2Modeling of a magnetic field
Publication Date: 2019.02.26 BIOSENSE WEBSTER (ISRAEL) LTD
  • US10213133B2 patent drawing
  • US10213133B2 patent drawing
  • US10213133B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, including generating a magnetic field in a region from a first magnetic field radiator located at a first position and a second magnetic field radiator located at a second position. A volume having a multiplicity of vertices is delineated within the region, and respective values of the magnetic field at the multiplicity of vertices are measured. In response to the respective values, respective first dipole moments to the first magnetic field radiator and respective second dipole moments to the second magnetic field radiator are assigned. A value of the magnetic field within the volume is calculated in terms of the first dipole moments and the second dipole moments.