Magnetic Flow Reactor Agitation Without Mechanical Seals

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing flow reactors face limitations in achieving effective agitation of process materials without requiring mechanical coupling to the drive mechanism, which can lead to issues like back mixing and increased pressure drops, especially at larger scales.

Innovation Solution

The use of agitated assemblies that can be vibrated or shaken, either through mechanical means like a vibrating table or magnetically coupled agitator elements, to increase fluid agitation within the system, allowing for adjustable cell sizes and configurations to optimize agitation without specific mass flow requirements or flow reversals.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If mechanical coupling is used to drive agitation elements, then agitation effectiveness is improved, but device complexity and reliability issues arise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveagitation effectivenessVSAvoidmechanical coupling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical coupling systems with magnetic coupling mechanisms. Magnetically driven agitators eliminate the need for mechanical shafts and seals, reducing complexity while maintaining agitation effectiveness through magnetic field transmission across the reactor wall.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The reactor wall acts as an intermediary medium that transmits magnetic fields from external drive mechanisms to internal agitators. This allows external control of internal agitation without direct mechanical connection, solving the complexity-reliability contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If larger scale reactors are used, then productivity is improved, but back mixing and pressure drops increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereactor capacityVSAvoidback mixing and pressure drops
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the reactor into multiple smaller cells arranged in series, with each cell containing its own magnetically driven agitator. This segmentation maintains high productivity while reducing back mixing and pressure drops by limiting the size of individual agitation zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs magnetic vibration mechanisms that induce oscillatory motion in agitators without requiring large mechanical forces. This allows effective mixing in larger volumes while minimizing pressure drops through reduced mechanical stress on the fluid.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #18Mechanical vibration

3Manufacturing precision

If specific mass flow rates are required for effective agitation, then mixing quality is improved, but adaptability to varying flow rates decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemixing qualityVSAvoidflow rate adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs magnetically driven agitators that can dynamically adjust their rotation speed and vibration frequency in response to varying flow conditions. This dynamic control allows effective mixing across a wide range of mass flow rates without requiring specific flow rate thresholds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters such as agitator speed and vibration frequency to maintain optimal mixing conditions across different flow rates. This parameter adjustment capability ensures consistent mixing quality regardless of the specific mass flow rate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances mixing and heat transfer conditions, reduces back mixing, and maintains effective agitation across varying flow rates and scales, improving the efficiency of chemical and biological processes in continuous reactors.

Implementation Method 1

The agitated assembly can be vibrated or shaken, either through mechanical means like a vibrating table or magnetically coupled agitator elements

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration: Vibration

Implementation Method 2

magnetically coupled agitator elements, to increase fluid agitation within the system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic coupling: Magnetic Field

Data Source

PatentUS8425106B2Flow reactor
Publication Date: 2013.04.23 ASHE MORRIS LTD
  • US8425106B2 patent drawing
  • US8425106B2 patent drawing
  • US8425106B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A reaction system and a reactor which comprises of two or more reaction cells wherein said cells are separated by inter cell conduits and having a means of causing agitation within the cells which does not require a mechanical connection of the agitating mechanism within the cell to a drive mechanism which is outside the cell.