Magnetic Head with Differing Read Sensors for Tape Wear Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In magnetic storage systems, particularly tape drive systems, achieving high data density and efficient data transfer is hindered by the challenge of maintaining optimal spacing between the magnetic head and tape, leading to issues with wear, shorting, and compatibility with different magnetic media formats.

Innovation Solution

A magnetic head with multiple read sensors of varying types, such as TMR, GMR, AMR, and inductive sensors, configured on a single module for linear magnetic recording, and an abrasion-resistant barrier layer to prevent wear and shorting, allowing for effective data transfer across different media formats.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the spacing between the magnetic head and tape is minimized to achieve effective magnetic coupling, then data read performance is improved, but wear and shorting between the head and tape increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata read performanceVSAvoidwear and shorting
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The magnetic head is divided into multiple independent sensor elements (AMR, GMR, TMR) that can be independently positioned at different distances from the tape. This allows each sensor type to operate at its optimal spacing, with more sensitive sensors positioned closer to the tape for better coupling while less sensitive sensors positioned farther away to reduce wear and shorting risks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the magnetic head have different sensor types with different magnetic sensitivity characteristics. AMR sensors are positioned for moderate coupling, GMR sensors for closer coupling with higher sensitivity, and TMR sensors for optimal local magnetic field detection. Each local region is optimized for its specific function, allowing the head as a whole to achieve both high performance and reduced wear.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple different types of read sensors are integrated on a single module to achieve compatibility with different magnetic media formats, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompatibility with different magnetic media formatsVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple different types of read sensors (AMR, GMR, TMR) are merged onto a single magnetic head module, allowing the system to read various magnetic media formats with different magnetic properties. This consolidation eliminates the need for multiple separate head modules or format-specific heads, reducing mechanical complexity while maintaining versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The magnetic head module is designed with multi-functional capability by integrating multiple sensor types that can detect different magnetic field strengths and characteristics. This universal head can read various magnetic tape formats (e.g., different track densities, magnetic coercivity) without requiring physical changes or additional components, achieving format compatibility through a single multi-functional device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enhances data transfer efficiency by maintaining near-contact coupling with the tape, reducing wear and shorting issues, and enabling compatibility with diverse magnetic media formats, thereby improving data density and system reliability.

Implementation Method 1

The read sensors are of at least two differing types selected from a group consisting of tunneling magnetoresistance (TMR), giant magnetoresistance (GMR), anisotropic magnetoresistance (AMR), and inductive sensors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTunneling magnetoresistance (TMR): Magnetoresistance

Implementation Method 2

The read sensors are of at least two differing types selected from a group consisting of tunneling magnetoresistance (TMR), giant magnetoresistance (GMR), anisotropic magnetoresistance (AMR), and inductive sensors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGiant magnetoresistance (GMR): Magnetoresistance

Implementation Method 3

The read sensors are of at least two differing types selected from a group consisting of tunneling magnetoresistance (TMR), giant magnetoresistance (GMR), anisotropic magnetoresistance (AMR), and inductive sensors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAnisotropic magnetoresistance (AMR): Magnetoresistance

Implementation Method 4

The read sensors are of at least two differing types selected from a group consisting of tunneling magnetoresistance (TMR), giant magnetoresistance (GMR), anisotropic magnetoresistance (AMR), and inductive sensors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS9911440B2Differing magnetic read sensors on a magnetic head
Publication Date: 2018.03.06 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US9911440B2 patent drawing
  • US9911440B2 patent drawing
  • US9911440B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus according to one embodiment includes a magnetic head having multiple magnetic transducers, the transducers including read sensors. The read sensors are of at least two differing types selected from a group consisting of tunneling magnetoresistance (TMR), giant magnetoresistance (GMR), anisotropic magnetoresistance (AMR), and inductive sensors.