Magnetic Head Pole Layer Magnetization Control for Perpendicular Recording

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Magnetic heads for perpendicular magnetic recording face challenges in suppressing pole erase phenomena without complicating the pole layer structure, leading to increased manufacturing costs and reduced throughput due to the complexity of existing techniques.

Innovation Solution

A magnetic head design featuring a pole layer with a track width defining portion and a wide portion, where the maximum width of the wide portion is greater than the track width, and the end face of the track width defining portion has regions with opposite magnetization directions, reducing the occurrence of pole erase without increasing structural complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If the pole layer structure is simplified to reduce manufacturing complexity, then manufacturing cost and throughput improve, but the ability to suppress pole erase deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidpole erase suppression
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the magnetization state parameter of the pole layer from a uniform state to a controlled non-uniform state with opposite magnetization directions in different regions. This parameter change enables pole erase suppression through magnetic field cancellation while maintaining a simple single-layer pole structure, thus resolving the contradiction between manufacturing simplicity and pole erase suppression capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention creates a composite magnetization structure within the pole layer by inducing opposite magnetization directions in different regions (first region and second region). This composite magnetization state acts as a distributed magnetic shield that suppresses pole erase without requiring additional physical material layers, thereby maintaining manufacturing simplicity while achieving reliable pole erase suppression

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Productivity

If the pole layer structure is simplified to improve manufacturing throughput, then productivity increases, but pole erase suppression capability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing throughputVSAvoidpole erase suppression
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the magnetization state parameter of the pole layer from a uniform state to a controlled non-uniform state with opposite magnetization directions in different regions. This parameter change enables pole erase suppression through magnetic field cancellation while maintaining a simple single-layer pole structure, thus resolving the contradiction between manufacturing simplicity and pole erase suppression capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The pole layer serves dual functions: it generates the write magnetic field for data recording and simultaneously suppresses pole erase through its controlled non-uniform magnetization state. This self-service capability eliminates the need for separate suppression structures, maintaining high manufacturing throughput while achieving reliable pole erase suppression

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If a complex pole layer structure with multiple layers is used to suppress pole erase, then pole erase suppression improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepole erase suppressionVSAvoidpole layer structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the magnetization state parameter of the pole layer from a uniform state to a controlled non-uniform state with opposite magnetization directions in different regions. This parameter change enables pole erase suppression through magnetic field cancellation while maintaining a simple single-layer pole structure, thus resolving the contradiction between manufacturing simplicity and pole erase suppression capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention extracts the pole erase suppression function from separate physical structures (additional layers or components) and integrates it into the magnetization state control of the existing pole layer. By taking out the suppression mechanism from structural complexity and embedding it in magnetic state control, the invention achieves reliable pole erase suppression with minimal device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design effectively suppresses pole erase occurrences while maintaining efficient write characteristics, reducing manufacturing costs, and improving the yield of magnetic heads by controlling the state of magnetization in the pole layer.

Implementation Method 1

a pole layer allowing a magnetic flux corresponding to the field generated by the coil to pass therethrough, and generating a write magnetic field

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic flux: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 2

a coil for generating a magnetic field corresponding to data to be written on the recording medium

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS7679861B2Magnetic head for perpendicular magnetic recording with controlled state of magnetization of the end face of the pole layer
Publication Date: 2010.03.16 TDK CORP
  • US7679861B2 patent drawing
  • US7679861B2 patent drawing
  • US7679861B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A pole layer incorporates a track width defining portion and a wide portion. The track width defining portion has an end face that is located in the medium facing surface and that defines the track width. The maximum width of the wide portion is greater than the track width and equal to or greater than the length of the wide portion taken in the direction orthogonal to the medium facing surface. When the coil is generating no magnetic field, in the end face of the track width defining portion, there exist first and second regions in which the directions of components of magnetization orthogonal to the medium facing surface are opposite.