Dynamic Write Policy Management for Magnetic Head Life Extension

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The use of energy-assisted recording techniques in data storage devices, such as Thermal Fly-Height Control (TFC), Heat Assisted Magnetic Recording (HAMR), and Microwave Assisted Magnetic Recording (MAMR), leads to a shortened usable life of the head due to component degradation and increased friction, as well as interference from disk lubricant and particles, which affects data reading and writing reliability.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a dynamic write policy management system that adjusts the power output of write-assistive components, such as heaters and microwave generators, to extend the life of heads by reducing heat and fly-height, using experimental write policies to evaluate and predict the usable life of heads and switch to more conservative settings when necessary.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If energy-assisted recording techniques (TFC, HAMR, MAMR) are used to increase storage density, then the areal density increases, but the usable life of the head decreases due to component degradation and increased friction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage densityVSAvoidusable life of head
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adjustment of write-assistive heater power based on real-time monitoring of head performance metrics. The system transitions from static power settings to dynamic control, adjusting heater power levels during operation to optimize the trade-off between storage density and head longevity. This allows the system to adapt to changing head conditions and extend usable life while maintaining high storage density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs feedback mechanisms by monitoring head performance metrics (such as write reliability, signal quality, and temperature) and using this information to adjust write-assistive heater power settings. This closed-loop control enables the system to detect early signs of head degradation and proactively reduce power levels to extend head life, while still maintaining adequate storage density performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Quantity of substance

If the fly-height between the head and disk is reduced to increase storage density, then the areal density increases, but the friction and wear on the head increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage densityVSAvoidfriction and wear
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the thermal parameter (heater power) to compensate for the reduced fly-height. By dynamically adjusting the heater power level, the system can maintain optimal write performance at lower fly-heights without excessively increasing friction and wear. This parameter adjustment allows the system to operate at higher storage densities while managing the harmful effects of increased contact pressure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Quantity of substance

If the power output of write-assistive components is increased to maintain write performance, then the storage density is maintained, but the heat and wear on the head increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage densityVSAvoidheat and wear
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by using only the necessary amount of heater power required to maintain adequate write performance, rather than continuously applying maximum power. The system dynamically determines the minimum power level needed to achieve acceptable write margins, thereby reducing unnecessary heat generation and wear while still maintaining storage density performance. This approach uses slightly less power than maximum capability, optimizing the trade-off between performance and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach extends the usable life of heads by reducing wear and tear, maintaining data reliability, and balancing short-term performance with long-term reliability through adaptive power management and write policy optimization.

Implementation Method 1

TFC uses a heater on the head to adjust a fly-height of the head over the disk

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal expansion: Thermal Expansion

Implementation Method 2

HAMR uses a laser diode on the head to heat a small region of the disk that is to be written by the head. The heating of the disk temporarily lowers the coercivity of grains in the disk

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal heating: Heating

Implementation Method 3

MAMR uses a Spin Torque Oscillator (STO) on the head to generate a microwave field that allows the disk to be more easily magnetized with a lower magnetic field

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMicrowave generation: Microwave Radiation

Data Source

PatentUS10283149B2Energy-assisted magnetic recording device capable of predicting the usable life of magnetic head
Publication Date: 2019.05.07 WESTERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US10283149B2 patent drawing
  • US10283149B2 patent drawing
  • US10283149B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A Data Storage Device (DSD) includes a magnetic storage medium and a head configured to read and write data using a current default write policy that affects an amount of power output by at least one write-assistive component of the head. One or more experimental writes are performed by writing data on the magnetic storage medium using an experimental write policy for the at least one write-assistive component, and the data is read from the magnetic storage medium. An experimental performance of the one or more experimental writes is evaluated based on the reading of the data. An experimental prediction value is determined indicating a predicted usable life of the head based on the evaluation of the experimental performance. Based on the experimental prediction value, it is determined whether to change the current default write policy for the at least one write-assistive component for future non-experimental writes.