Magnetic Layer Chemical Ordering Gradient for Storage Density

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Magnetic recording media with perpendicular grain arrangements offer more compact storage but suffer from decreased thermal stability, necessitating improved magnetic layer designs that balance magnetic hardness and thermal stability.

Innovation Solution

A magnetic layer with varying degrees of chemical ordering and molecular structure across discrete sub-layers, formed from alloys like FePt, where the degree of ordering and structure change with distance from the substrate, enhancing magnetic hardness and thermal stability through an exchange-coupled composite structure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If perpendicular grain arrangement is used in magnetic recording media, then storage density is improved, but thermal stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage densityVSAvoidthermal stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The magnetic layer is divided into multiple sub-layers with different degrees of chemical ordering. The first sub-layer (closer to substrate) has higher chemical ordering and provides thermal stability, while the second sub-layer (farther from substrate) has lower chemical ordering and facilitates magnetization switching, enabling both high storage density and thermal stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the magnetic layer are given different properties: the first sub-layer has high chemical ordering for thermal stability, while the second sub-layer has low chemical ordering for easy magnetization switching. This local differentiation allows the system to simultaneously achieve high storage density and thermal stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of manufacture

If uniform chemical ordering is applied throughout the magnetic layer, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but magnetic performance is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidmagnetic performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The degree of chemical ordering parameter is varied through the thickness of the magnetic layer. By controlling deposition conditions or applying post-deposition treatments, the alloy transitions from high chemical ordering near the substrate to low chemical ordering at the surface, optimizing both thermal stability and magnetization switching characteristics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a magnetic layer with increased thermal stability and reduced switching field, maintaining data integrity and storage density while optimizing magnetic properties.

Implementation Method 1

The magnetic layer includes an alloy that has magnetic hardness that is a function of the degree of chemical ordering of the alloy

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical ordering:

Implementation Method 2

changing the temperature of the alloy to vary the degree of chemical ordering of the alloy with respect to distance from the substrate within the layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTemperature-dependent chemical ordering:

Implementation Method 3

enhancing magnetic hardness and thermal stability through an exchange-coupled composite structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectExchange coupling:

Data Source

PatentUS8795764B1Magnetic layer
Publication Date: 2014.08.05 SEAGATE TECH LLC
  • US8795764B1 patent drawing
  • US8795764B1 patent drawing
  • US8795764B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus includes a substrate and a magnetic layer coupled to the substrate. The magnetic layer includes an alloy that has magnetic hardness that is a function of the degree of chemical ordering of the alloy. The degree of chemical ordering of the alloy in a first portion of the magnetic layer is greater than the degree of chemical ordering of the alloy in a second portion of the magnetic layer, and the first portion of the magnetic layer is closer to the substrate than the second portion of the magnetic layer.