Magnetic Pool Cover Locking Mechanism for Water Level Adaptation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing pool cover locking devices fail to adapt to varying water levels due to evaporation and require manual operation, posing risks during accidental falls and complicating pool maintenance.

Innovation Solution

A magnetic locking device with complementary magnetic means on the pool wall and cover, allowing automatic locking and unlocking without manual intervention, ensuring the cover remains secure across different water levels and positions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a tab or rod locking device is used to hold the last slat of the cover in position, then the cover can be locked in the deployed position, but the device cannot adapt to variations in water line level due to evaporation

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAdaptability to water line level variationsVSAvoidLocking reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the traditional mechanical tab or rod locking system with a magnetic locking system. The magnetic means can flexibly adapt to varying water levels while maintaining reliable locking through magnetic attraction force, eliminating the need for mechanical contact that requires precise alignment with the water line.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The magnetic locking system changes the locking parameter from mechanical position (tab/rod insertion depth) to magnetic field interaction. This allows the locking mechanism to adapt to different water levels by simply adjusting the position of the magnetic means on the cover, while the magnetic attraction force remains effective across a range of positions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If a tab or rod locking device is used, then the cover can be locked, but it requires equipping the cover with a specific extremal blade and screwing elements to the pool walls

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveInstallation simplicityVSAvoidCover structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the locking function from the cover structure itself and places it on the pool wall side through magnetic means. This eliminates the need for complex extremal blades and screwing elements on the cover, simplifying both the cover design and installation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The magnetic means acts as an intermediary between the cover and the pool wall, providing the locking function without requiring direct mechanical connection or modification of the cover structure. This intermediary approach simplifies the cover design while maintaining effective locking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Extent of automation

If a traditional locking device is used, then the cover can be locked, but manual actuation is required to open the cover

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAutomatic locking and unlockingVSAvoidUser operation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The magnetic locking system provides automatic locking when the cover is in the deployed position, and the magnetic force can be easily canceled or adjusted by the user without complex manual actuation mechanisms. The system essentially locks itself through magnetic attraction when conditions are right.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The magnetic locking system allows dynamic adjustment of the locking state. The magnetic force can be easily modulated or canceled by the user through simple actions, enabling smooth transition between locked and unlocked states without rigid mechanical actuation mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Adaptability or versatility

If magnetic means are used on the pool cover to adhere to metal walls, then automatic locking is achieved, but the basin structure must be made of metallic material with adequate magnetic properties

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCompatibility with different pool structuresVSAvoidInstallation restrictions
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The magnetic locking system is designed to work with various pool wall materials by using magnetic means that can detect and adhere to different surfaces. The system provides universal compatibility across different pool constructions while maintaining effective locking functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The magnetic locking device provides secure, automatic operation of the pool cover, adapting to water level changes and ensuring safety without manual operation, facilitating easy maintenance and installation on various pool configurations.

Implementation Method 1

an attractive magnetic force is exerted between the two magnetic means when they are arranged facing each other, such a magnetic force being capable of temporarily guaranteeing locking of the swimming pool cover in the deployed position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic force: Magnetism

Data Source

PatentEP2868842B1Device for locking a swimming-pool cover in an extended position
Publication Date: 2016.05.04 ANNONAY PRODIONS FRANCE
  • EP2868842B1 patent drawingFigure 1~4
  • EP2868842B1 patent drawingFigure 5~8
  • EP2868842B1 patent drawingFigure 9~11

AI summary

A locking device in a deployed position of a pool cover (2) (3), said cover (2) being movable between said deployed position in which it covers the water (4) of the pool (3) and a retracted position allowing access to said pool (3), said locking device being characterized in that it comprises at least two complementary magnetic means, a first magnetic means (5) present at a wall (7) of said pool (3), and a second magnetic means (6) arranged at an extremity portion of said cover (2), and in that an attractive magnetic force is exerted between the two magnetic means (5) and (6) when they are arranged opposite each other, said magnetic force being capable of temporarily ensuring the locking of the pool cover (3) in said deployed position,said device comprising means for canceling the magnetic force to allow the return of said cover (2) to the retracted position.