Magnetic Position Sensor External Field Compensation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing magnetic field sensors are susceptible to interference from external fields, which affects their measurement accuracy and reliability, particularly in applications requiring precise position determination in user input interfaces like joysticks and rotary switches.

Innovation Solution

A method and device that generate a magnetic field around a rotation point, with three-dimensional Hall sensors recording the near-field at two locations, allowing position determination through differential vector analysis, effectively compensating for external field interference by maintaining a consistent magnetic axis orientation and using cylindrical magnets with arbitrary polarization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If magnetic field sensors are used for position determination, then position detection capability is enabled, but measurement accuracy deteriorates due to external field interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition detection accuracyVSAvoidexternal field interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The measurement system is segmented into multiple independent measurement locations (first and second measurement locations) along the magnetic field measurement axis. Each location has its own sensor that independently measures the magnetic field, allowing differential processing to eliminate common-mode external field interference while preserving the position-dependent signal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback by continuously measuring the magnetic field at multiple locations and using these measurements to calculate position through differential processing. The measured values from both locations are fed into the evaluation unit which computes the position based on the difference, creating a closed-loop measurement system that compensates for external field variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Device complexity

If three-dimensional magnetic field sensors are used, then functional integration and compactness are improved, but susceptibility to external field interference increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor integrationVSAvoidexternal field interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The integrated 3D magnetic field sensor is segmented into multiple measurement locations along the measurement axis. By distributing sensors at different positions (first and second measurement locations), the system maintains the benefits of integration while enabling differential measurement to reject external field interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from single-point measurement to multi-point measurement along the magnetic field measurement axis. This dimensional extension allows the system to capture spatial variations in the magnetic field and use differential processing to eliminate external field interference while maintaining compact integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If single-point magnetic field measurement is used, then device simplicity is maintained, but position determination reliability deteriorates due to external field influence

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition determination reliabilityVSAvoidmeasurement system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The measurement system is divided into multiple measurement locations (first and second measurement locations) with separate sensors at each location. This segmentation enables differential measurement that cancels external field interference, significantly improving position determination reliability while adding only minimal structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses partial measurement information from multiple locations to achieve the desired reliability. By measuring at two specific locations along the axis and using differential processing, the system obtains sufficient information for accurate position determination without requiring complete spatial mapping, balancing reliability improvement with acceptable complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances position detection accuracy and reliability by minimizing external field influence, enabling precise position determination in user input interfaces with improved robustness against field strength fluctuations.

Implementation Method 1

three-dimensional measuring Hall elements

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHall effect: Hall Effect

Data Source

PatentEP2829846B1Method and device for determining position with external field compensation
Publication Date: 2017.12.06 ROBERT SEUFFER
  • EP2829846B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2829846B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~4B
  • EP2829846B1 patent drawingFigure 5A~6B

AI summary

The present invention relates to a device and a method for determining position, wherein the position of a first mechanical element relative to a second mechanical element is determined based on a magnetic field generated by a magnet (10), which, during relative movement between the first and second mechanical elements, essentially migrates about a point of rotation (25) and whose main direction during migration always points essentially towards the point of rotation (25). The near field of the magnetic field is detected at two different locations between which the point of rotation (25) is located, and the position is determined based on the difference in the measured values ​​at the two different locations.