Magnetic Reusable Closure for Replaceable Barrier Openings

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing closure systems are often permanently attached to objects, lacking versatility and requiring replacement of the entire object if damaged, which can lead to security issues and environmental risks due to unsealed barriers.

Innovation Solution

A reusable closure system featuring a backing member secured to an object with a closure member connected via magnets, allowing for easy attachment and detachment, and an optional outer closure member with a zipper for secure and versatile opening and closing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If closure systems are permanently attached to objects, then security and barrier integrity are improved, but versatility and ease of replacement deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebarrier integrityVSAvoidclosure system versatility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The closure system is divided into separate components: a backing member that attaches to the object and a closure member that can be independently attached and detached from the backing member. This segmentation allows the closure system to maintain secure attachment (reliability) while enabling easy replacement and reconfiguration (versatility) without permanently modifying the object.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The closure system transitions from static permanent attachment to dynamic removable attachment. The backing member can be selectively attached and detached from objects, and the closure member can be independently positioned along the backing member, providing adaptability while maintaining secure closure when engaged.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Stability of the object's composition

If closure systems are integrated to the object, then structural stability is improved, but ease of repair and replacement deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidclosure system replacement
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The closure system is segmented into a backing member and a closure member that can be independently replaced. If the closure member becomes damaged, only that component needs replacement rather than the entire integrated system, significantly improving ease of repair while the backing member remains attached to maintain structural stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The design allows the closure member to be easily discarded and replaced without affecting the backing member or the object. The magnetic attachment mechanism enables quick removal of damaged closure members and installation of new ones, facilitating easy repair while maintaining the stable attachment of the backing member to the object.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Ease of manufacture

If fixed closure systems are used, then manufacturing simplicity is improved, but user versatility and selective opening deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoiduser-selected opening
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The closure member can be dynamically positioned at different locations along the backing member and selectively attached or detached. This dynamic capability provides user versatility for selective opening at different positions while the overall attachment mechanism remains simple and manufacturable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The magnetic attachment mechanism replaces complex mechanical fastening systems with a simpler magnetic field-based attachment. This substitution maintains ease of manufacture while enabling easy user operation for selective opening and closing without requiring complex mechanical components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables user-selective opening and closing of objects like tents and greenhouses without damaging the object, allowing for easy replacement of the closure system rather than the entire object, enhancing security and reducing environmental risks.

Implementation Method 1

the closure member including a first portion which is removably connected to a second portion by one or more magnets

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetism: Magnetism

Implementation Method 2

a backing member adapted to be secured to an object, such as by an adhesive

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Data Source

PatentUS10905203B2Reusable closure system
Publication Date: 2021.02.02 RE U ZIP LLC
  • US10905203B2 patent drawing
  • US10905203B2 patent drawing
  • US10905203B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A reusable closure system for providing easy closure and opening of an object such as a sheet forming a barrier. The reusable closure system generally includes a backing member adapted to be secured to an object, such as by an adhesive. A closure member may be connected to the backing member, with the closure member including a first portion which is removably connected to a second portion by one or more magnets. An optional outer closure member may be connected to the closure member, with the outer closure member including a zipper. Thus, the reusable closure system may be secured to various objects to allow for selective opening or closing of the objects in a versatile, user-selected manner.