Oriented-Flux Magnetic Ring Segmentation for Lower Eddy Current Loss

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing rotating electric machines with Halbach topology permanent magnets suffer from high eddy current losses and material expansion-related stresses, and the segmentation of magnets increases manufacturing complexity and duration.

Innovation Solution

A method for dimensioning a multi-pole oriented-flux magnetic ring that involves determining characteristic dimensions and reference values to decide on circumferential segmentation of magnets into sub-magnets, minimizing eddy current losses and reducing the number of sub-magnets needed, thereby simplifying the manufacturing process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If the magnet is segmented axially into ten magnets to minimize eddy current losses, then eddy current losses are reduced, but the manufacturing complexity and duration increase due to the need to manufacture, crop and glue many magnets

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeddy current lossesVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the magnet into a smaller number of axially stacked segments (2-5 segments) rather than the conventional 10 segments. This segmentation reduces eddy current losses while minimizing manufacturing complexity by reducing the number of magnets that need to be manufactured, cropped, and glued to the rotor

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the segmentation parameter from the conventional 10 axial segments to an optimized range of 2-5 axial segments. This parameter change maintains sufficient eddy current loss reduction while significantly reducing manufacturing complexity and assembly duration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of energy

If the magnet is segmented axially into ten magnets to minimize eddy current losses, then eddy current losses are reduced, but the manufacturing duration increases due to the need to manufacture and assemble many magnets

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeddy current lossesVSAvoidmanufacturing duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses axial segmentation into 2-5 segments instead of 10 segments, which reduces the number of manufacturing and assembly operations required, thereby reducing manufacturing duration while still achieving sufficient eddy current loss reduction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial segmentation (2-5 segments instead of 10) which provides sufficient eddy current loss reduction without the excessive manufacturing effort and time required for full 10-segment segmentation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Temperature

If the annular magnet is heated, then thermal expansion occurs, but stresses appear in the rotor liable to crack or break the annular magnet due to different coefficients of expansion between support and magnet

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethermal expansionVSAvoidmagnet integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the magnet axially into multiple pieces that are stacked to form the annular magnet. This segmentation creates expansion joints between segments that accommodate thermal expansion differences between the magnet and support, preventing stress buildup that would crack or break a solid annular magnet

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces axial dimensioning through segmentation, creating separation in the axial direction between magnet segments and the support structure. This dimensional approach allows thermal expansion in the radial direction without generating destructive stresses, as the segmented structure can accommodate expansion movements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces eddy current losses and manufacturing complexity by optimizing the segmentation of magnets, ensuring fewer sub-magnets are required, which in turn decreases the duration and complexity of rotor assembly while maintaining magnetic performance.

Implementation Method 1

the magnetic fields of the successive magnets are oriented so as to amplify the resulting magnetic field in the air gap while eliminating the resulting magnetic field on the opposite side of the magnets

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 2

when the annular magnet is heated stresses appear in the rotor, liable to crack or break the annular magnet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal expansion: Thermal Expansion

Implementation Method 3

the magnet generates high losses by eddy current

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEddy current: Eddy Currents

Data Source

PatentUS20250023410A1Method for dimensioning a multi-pole oriented-flux magnetic ring, and associated rotor, rotating electric machine and aircraft
Publication Date: 2025.01.16 SAFRAN SA
  • US20250023410A1 patent drawing
  • US20250023410A1 patent drawing
  • US20250023410A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The method for dimensioning a multi-pole oriented-flux magnetic ring for a rotor of a rotating electric machine, where the magnetic ring includes a predetermined number of pairs of poles, and the magnetic ring is formed by at least one oriented-flux magnet. The method includes determining a characteristic dimension of the magnet equal to the minimum value out of the outer perimeter of the ring and the axial length of the ring, determining a reference value equal to the minimum value out of a predetermined reference length and twice the value Pi, comparing the characteristic dimension of the magnet with the reference value, and if the characteristic dimension of the magnet is greater than the reference value, the method comprises circumferentially dividing the magnet into at least two sub-magnets.