Magnetic Sensor Core Clearance and Interference Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing magnetic sensor devices face challenges in miniaturization while maintaining accurate measurements of three magnetic field components aligned perpendicularly, due to interference between magnetic core structures and coils, which limits their compact design and increases manufacturing costs.

Innovation Solution

The magnetic sensor device employs a specific configuration where magnetic core structures are positioned with a clearance of less than 20% of their maximum extension, allowing for close placement without significant interference, enabling miniaturization and reducing manufacturing costs by allowing multiple devices to be produced on a shared wafer.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If magnetic core structures are placed close to each other for miniaturization, then device volume is reduced, but interference between measuring elements increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice volumeVSAvoidinterference between measuring elements
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

A non-magnetic spacer structure is introduced as an intermediary element between the first and second magnetic core structures. This spacer prevents direct magnetic interaction while allowing the cores to be positioned close together, thus reducing interference effects while maintaining miniaturization benefits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The magnetic core structures are designed with specific local properties: they have magnetization directions oriented perpendicular to each other, and their geometries are optimized (e.g., elongated shapes aligned with detection directions). This local differentiation allows each core to measure a specific magnetic field component while minimizing cross-interference with other cores

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Adaptability or versatility

If three fluxgate magnetometers are aligned at right angles for three-axis measurement, then measurement capability is improved, but device complexity and volume increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethree-axis measurement capabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple measuring functions are merged into a compact integrated structure. The first and second magnetic core structures with their respective coils are combined in close proximity with perpendicular orientations, allowing three-axis magnetic field measurement in a single integrated device rather than separate components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The magnetic core structures utilize three-dimensional spatial arrangement with perpendicular orientations along different axes. By exploiting the third dimension (vertical stacking or orthogonal positioning), the device achieves three-axis measurement capability without proportionally increasing planar footprint

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Ease of manufacture

If clearance between magnetic core structures is reduced for miniaturization, then manufacturing cost is reduced, but measurement accuracy may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidmeasurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The non-magnetic spacer acts as a controlled intermediary that maintains a precise, minimal clearance between magnetic core structures. This ensures manufacturing feasibility with reduced costs while the spacer's non-magnetic properties prevent interference that would compromise measurement accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The clearance distance between magnetic core structures is optimized to a specific parameter range (less than 20% of the maximum extension of the first magnetic core structure). This parameter optimization balances miniaturization benefits with measurement accuracy requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration minimizes interference between measuring elements, enabling the production of compact, cost-effective magnetic sensor devices suitable for diverse applications, including mobile devices, by reducing the device's size and weight while maintaining accurate measurements.

Implementation Method 1

Fluxgate magnetometers, which are used in digital compasses, for example, are available. A fluxgate magnetometer, which may also be referred to as a Förster probe, has a drive coil and a detector coil which are guided around a magnet core.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

The present invention relates to a magnetic sensor device... measure three magnetic field components of a magnetic field... magnetic core structures... passive measuring element... active measuring element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetism: Magnetism

Data Source

PatentUS9778323B2Magnetic sensor device and manufacturing method for a magnetic sensor device
Publication Date: 2017.10.03 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US9778323B2 patent drawing
  • US9778323B2 patent drawing
  • US9778323B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A magnetic sensor device having a first magnetic core structure which is aligned along a first central longitudinal axis and has at least one first coil, and having a second magnetic core structure which includes at least one second coil, the second magnetic core structure extending from a first end face of the second magnetic core structure along a second central longitudinal axis to a second end face of the second magnetic core structure, the second central longitudinal axis lying in a plane aligned in a direction normal to the first central longitudinal axis, and the second magnetic core structure being positioned in relation to the first magnetic core structure in such a way that a clearance between the first end face of the second magnetic core structure and a first center of mass of the first magnetic core structure is less than 20% of a maximum extension of the first magnetic core structure along the first central longitudinal axis.