Magnetic Sensor MR Element Edge Thickness Profile

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Magnetic sensors using magnetoresistive elements face nonlinearity in detection signals due to demagnetizing fields, which limits the range of magnetic field detection and increases errors in signal processing, as the strength of demagnetizing fields varies between the edges and midsection of the magnetic layer.

Innovation Solution

The magnetic sensor design includes a magnetoresistive element with a magnetic layer having a thickness and inclination angle that varies across its surface, reducing the concentration of magnetic charges at the edges by making the thickness smaller at the edges compared to the midsection and adjusting the inclination angle, thereby expanding the range where the detection signal changes linearly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If the magnetic layer has uniform thickness across the surface, then the manufacturing process is simple, but the detection signal becomes nonlinear due to varying demagnetizing field strength at edges versus midsection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoiddetection signal linearity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The magnetic layer is designed with non-uniform thickness where the thickness is smaller at the edges and larger at the midsection. This local variation in thickness compensates for the demagnetizing field strength differences across the magnetic layer, making the detection signal more linear while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through standard thin-film deposition techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-generated harmful factors

If the thickness of the magnetic layer is reduced at the edges, then the concentration of magnetic charges at the edges is reduced, but the manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnetic charge concentration at edgesVSAvoidthickness uniformity control
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The thickness parameter of the magnetic layer is deliberately varied across the surface, with specific control to reduce thickness at edges and increase it at the midsection. This parameter change is implemented through controlled thin-film deposition processes, achieving the desired thickness profile to reduce magnetic charge concentration while maintaining manufacturability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If the magnetic layer thickness varies across the surface, then the range of linear detection signal expansion is increased, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection rangeVSAvoidmagnetic layer structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The magnetic layer employs local quality variations in thickness to expand the linear detection range. The thickness is specifically controlled to be smaller at edges and larger at the midsection, creating a tailored magnetic charge distribution that enhances detection capability without requiring complex multi-layer structures or additional components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design reduces the nonlinearity of the detection signal, allowing for a broader range of magnetic field detection and improving signal processing accuracy by minimizing the difference in demagnetizing fields across the magnetic layer.

Implementation Method 1

a magnetoresistive element whose resistance changes with an external magnetic field

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetoresistance: Magnetoresistance

Implementation Method 2

a magnetic layer having a magnetization whose direction is variable depending on the direction of an applied magnetic field

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic anisotropy: Anisotropy

Implementation Method 3

Magnetic anisotropy is often controlled by using magnetic shape anisotropy. Magnetic shape anisotropy can be set by patterning the magnetoresistive element to a shape that is long in one direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic shape anisotropy: Anisotropy

Implementation Method 4

a demagnetizing field in a direction opposite to that of the external magnetic field occurs in the magnetic layer due to magnetic charges occurring at the edges of the magnetic layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDemagnetizing field: Magnetic Field

Data Source

PatentUS20250093434A1Magnetic sensor
Publication Date: 2025.03.20 TDK CORP
  • US20250093434A1 patent drawing
  • US20250093434A1 patent drawing
  • US20250093434A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A magnetic sensor includes an MR element. The MR element includes a free layer. The free layer has a first surface having a shape that is long in one direction and a second surface located opposite the first surface, and has a thickness that is a dimension in a direction perpendicular to the first surface. The first surface has a first edge and a second edge located at both lateral ends of the first surface. In a given cross section, the thickness at the first edge is smaller than the thickness at a predetermined point on the first surface between the first edge and the second edge.