Magnetic Sensor Sensitivity Averaging for Stable Field Measurement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sensitivity measurement methods for magnetic sensors, such as those described in Non-Patent Document 1, become complicated and may fail to converge due to the addition of weighting parameters, leading to inaccurate calculations.

Innovation Solution

A sensitivity measurement method that calculates the sensitivity of a magnetic sensor based on a simple average value of theoretical magnetic field strengths at evenly distributed virtual sensitivity points within the sensor's housing, reducing calculation complexity and maintaining accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If weighting parameters (relative sensitivity) are added to multiple sensitivity points for measurement accuracy, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and calculation difficulty increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensitivity measurement accuracyVSAvoidcalculation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the complex weighting parameters (relative sensitivity) from the calculation model. By using only the magnetic field strength values at multiple sensitivity points without any weighting factors, the calculation becomes a simple average that is computationally straightforward while still providing accurate sensitivity measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the calculation parameters from a weighted sum model (requiring relative sensitivity values) to an unweighted average model. This parameter change eliminates the need for complex weighting calculations while maintaining measurement accuracy, directly resolving the contradiction between precision and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If weighting parameters are added to sensitivity points, then measurement precision may be improved, but reliability of convergence deteriorates as calculations may fail to converge

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensitivity measurement accuracyVSAvoidcalculation convergence
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the weighting parameters that cause convergence problems. By calculating sensitivity based solely on the average of magnetic field strengths at multiple points without any weighting factors, the calculation becomes numerically stable and reliably convergent while preserving measurement accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Measurement precision

If complex weighting calculations are performed at multiple sensitivity points, then measurement precision is improved, but productivity decreases due to increased calculation time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensitivity measurement accuracyVSAvoidcalculation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the computationally intensive weighting parameters from the sensitivity calculation. The simplified approach of averaging magnetic field strengths at multiple sensitivity points requires minimal computation, dramatically improving calculation efficiency while maintaining accurate sensitivity measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the complex mechanical calculation process (weighted summation requiring multiple parameters) with a simpler mathematical operation (unweighted averaging). This substitution reduces computational burden and increases productivity while preserving measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method allows for accurate sensitivity calculation with reduced computational effort, enabling more precise magnetism measurement and accurate spatial positioning of magnetic field sources using arrays of magnetic sensors.

Implementation Method 1

a magnetism collecting body for collecting a magnetic field to the sensor chip

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field concentration: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 2

a sensor chip having a magnetosensitive element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetoresistance effect: Magnetoresistance

Data Source

PatentUS20250377419A1Magnetic sensor, sensitivity measurement method thereof, and magnetic field source detection device
Publication Date: 2025.12.11 TDK CORP
  • US20250377419A1 patent drawing
  • US20250377419A1 patent drawing
  • US20250377419A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein is a sensitivity measurement method for measuring a sensitivity of a magnetic sensor provided with a sensor chip having a magnetosensitive element, a magnetism collecting body for collecting a magnetic field to the sensor chip, and a housing for accommodating therein the sensor chip and the magnetism collecting body. The method includes applying a magnetic field to the magnetic sensor, and calculating the sensitivity of the magnetic sensor based on a simple average value of theoretical magnetic field strengths at a plurality of virtual sensitivity points evenly distributed inside the housing and an output value output from the senor chip.