Magnetic Spinning Top With Repelling Controller

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional toy tops are limited to passive observation, lacking interactive elements that could enhance play experiences, such as directional control and collision scenarios.

Innovation Solution

A toy top design incorporating a magnetic controller with opposing magnetic fields, powered by a spinning gear activated by a rip cord, allowing users to maneuver the top while it spins without physical contact, minimizing friction and maintaining rotational speed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a traditional toy top is used for passive observation, then the structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but the play experience is limited and lacks interactivity

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveinteractivityVSAvoidstructure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The top is divided into functionally independent modules: the spinning top body with embedded repelled magnets, the separate magnetic controller with controlling magnets, and the rip-cord activation mechanism. This segmentation allows the top to maintain simple manufacturing for the basic spinning function while adding complex magnetic interaction capabilities through the separate controller unit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Magnetic fields serve as an intermediary between the controller and the top, enabling contactless interaction. The controlling magnets in the controller and repelled magnets in the top interact through magnetic repulsion forces, allowing directional control without physical contact, thus enhancing interactivity while minimizing frictional losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If physical contact is used to maneuver the top, then directional control is achieved, but friction reduces rotational speed and maintains less balance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedirectional controlVSAvoidrotational speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces direct mechanical contact control with a magnetic field-based control system. The magnetic controller uses opposing magnetic fields to exert force on the spinning top without physical contact, substituting the traditional mechanical pushing or touching method with a non-contact magnetic interaction that preserves rotational speed and balance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

Magnetic fields act as an intermediary force transmission medium between the controller and the top. This allows directional maneuvering through magnetic repulsion without the friction that would result from direct physical contact, maintaining the top's rotational speed and gyroscopic balance while achieving ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Loss of energy

If magnetic fields are used to control the top, then friction is minimized and rotational speed is maintained, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrictional lossesVSAvoidmagnetic components
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces friction-based mechanical contact systems with a magnetic field-based control system. By using opposing magnetic fields from controlling magnets and repelled magnets, the system achieves contactless actuation that eliminates frictional energy losses, maintaining rotational speed without the need for complex mechanical transmission components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes changes in magnetic field parameters (strength, direction, polarity) to control the top's movement. By varying the orientation and intensity of the magnetic fields from the controller, precise directional control is achieved while maintaining energy efficiency and minimizing frictional losses, justifying the added magnetic component complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Measurement precision

If multiple magnets are embedded in the top, then magnetic control precision is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnetic control precisionVSAvoidmanufacturing
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The magnetic control system is segmented into the top unit with embedded repelled magnets and the separate controller unit with controlling magnets. This segmentation allows the top to be manufactured with a manageable number of magnets positioned in specific orientations, while the controller provides the active magnetic field modulation, balancing manufacturing ease with control precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements local quality by positioning multiple repelled magnets at specific locations and orientations within the top body. This strategic placement creates localized magnetic interaction zones that enable precise directional control when interacted with by the controller's magnetic fields, achieving high control precision without requiring magnets throughout the entire structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables interactive play by allowing directional control of the spinning top, introducing new play aspects like collisions, while maintaining speed and balance through magnetic forces, reducing frictional losses.

Implementation Method 1

The magnetic controller houses a at least one controlling magnet which directs a magnetic field of opposite polarity than the field directed outwards by the at least one repelled magnet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic repulsion: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 2

The top is maneuvered by allowing the magnetic field of the magnetic controller to contact the magnetic field of the at least one repelled magnet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLorentz force: Lorentz Force

Implementation Method 3

a spinning gear, a rip cord with gear-teeth

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical advantage through gear teeth: Gear

Implementation Method 4

spinning the top and watching its rotational and gyroscopic movement

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGyroscopic stability: Gyroscope

Data Source

PatentUS8083566B2Spinning toy top controlled by repelling magnetic controller
Publication Date: 2011.12.27 ACUTE VENTURES PROPERTIES LLC DBA THOUGHTS TO PAPER
  • US8083566B2 patent drawing
  • US8083566B2 patent drawing
  • US8083566B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A toy top which encases a plurality of repelled magnets and a magnetic controller which encases a controlling magnet. The repelled magnets in the top direct a magnetic field away from their embodiment with an opposing polarity to the magnetic field directed by the magnetic controller and away from its embodiment. Contact of the two opposing magnetic fields results in a magnetic force which repels the top away from the magnetic controller while the top is spinning. The top is put into a rotational spin by pulling a rip cord through a handle and turning a spinning gear fit into the top's gear fitting.