Magnetic Tape Back Coating Layer Thickness and Viscoelasticity Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Magnetic tapes with back coating layers thinned to less than 0.30 μm experience significant edge damage during use, leading to increased errors and reduced running stability due to disordered winding and contact failures between the magnetic and back coating layers.

Innovation Solution

A magnetic tape design with a back coating layer thickness of 0.10 to 0.30 μm, incorporating fatty acid ester and specific viscoelastic and interferometry measurements to ensure a stable contact state between the magnetic and back coating layers, including a logarithmic decrement of 0.010 to 0.060, full width at half maximum of 0 to 10.0 nm, and a spacing difference of 0 to 8.0 nm after vacuum heating, to prevent edge damage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the back coating layer is thinned to increase recording capacity, then the magnetic tape thickness is reduced and recording capacity is improved, but edge damage occurs and running stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecording capacityVSAvoidrunning stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely controlling the thickness of the back coating layer within the range of 0.01 μm to 0.30 μm, and by controlling the logarithmic decrement to be 0.005 to 0.060. These parameter optimizations allow the thin back coating layer to maintain sufficient mechanical strength and contact stability, preventing edge damage while enabling high recording capacity through reduced overall tape thickness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If the back coating layer is thinned to increase recording capacity, then the magnetic tape thickness is reduced and recording capacity is improved, but the magnetic layer and back coating layer separate and edge damage occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecording capacityVSAvoidcontact stability between layers
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent controls the logarithmic decrement of the back coating layer to be within 0.005 to 0.060, which optimizes the viscoelastic properties and adhesion characteristics. This parameter control ensures that even with a thin back coating layer (0.01-0.30 μm), the magnetic layer and back coating layer maintain stable contact without separation, preventing edge damage while achieving high recording capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite material design by combining the magnetic layer with a back coating layer containing specifically controlled materials that exhibit optimal adhesion properties. The back coating layer is formulated with materials that provide both the necessary thinness for high capacity and the appropriate mechanical properties (logarithmic decrement 0.005-0.060) to maintain strong bonding with the magnetic layer, preventing delamination and edge damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Productivity

If the back coating layer is thinned to increase recording capacity, then the magnetic tape thickness is reduced and recording capacity is improved, but disordered winding occurs and edge damage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecording capacityVSAvoidwinding stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the back coating layer thickness to 0.01-0.30 μm and controls the logarithmic decrement within 0.005 to 0.060. These parameter settings provide the right balance between flexibility and structural integrity, enabling the thin tape to wind orderly on the reel without disordered winding, while still achieving high recording capacity through reduced thickness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively prevents edge damage by maintaining a stable contact state and uniform adhesiveness between the magnetic and back coating layers, even at high recording and reproducing speeds, thereby enhancing the magnetic tape's recording capacity and stability.

Implementation Method 1

a logarithmic decrement acquired by a pendulum viscoelasticity test performed regarding the surface of the back coating layer is equal to or smaller than 0.060

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectViscoelasticity: Viscoelasticity

Implementation Method 2

the back coating layer includes fatty acid ester

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLubrication: Lubrication

Implementation Method 3

a full width at half maximum of spacing distribution measured by optical interferometry regarding the surface of the back coating layer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical interferometry: Interference

Data Source

PatentUS10424330B2Magnetic tape having characterized back coating layer
Publication Date: 2019.09.24 FUJIFILM CORP
  • US10424330B2 patent drawing
  • US10424330B2 patent drawing
  • US10424330B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A magnetic tape includes a back coating layer having a thickness less than or equal to 0.30 μm and containing fatty acid ester. The logarithmic decrement acquired by a pendulum viscoelasticity test performed regarding the surface of the back coating layer is less than or equal to 0.060. The full width at half maximum of spacing distribution measured by optical interferometry regarding the surface of the back coating layer before and after performing a vacuum heating with respect to the magnetic tape is respectively greater than 0 nm and less than or equal to 10.0 nm, and the difference between the spacing measured by optical interferometry regarding the surface of the back coating layer after performing the vacuum heating and the spacing measured before performing the vacuum heating is greater than 0 nm and less than or equal to 8.0 nm.