Magnetic Tomography for Metallic Structure Defect Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for inspecting and maintaining metallic constructions, particularly pipelines, are inefficient and costly, especially for inaccessible areas, and lack real-time monitoring capabilities, leading to potential failures due to external interference and corrosion.

Innovation Solution

A method utilizing remote, non-destructive magnetic tomography (MT) for defect detection and risk-factor assessment, combined with in-contact mechanical stress measurements, to generate an optimal maintenance schedule and visualize structural integrity, enabling real-time monitoring and prioritization of repairs without disrupting operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional in-line inspection (ILI) using intelligent pigging is used for defect detection, then defect detection capability is improved, but the method becomes unavailable for a wide range of objects requiring full disruptive inspection and significant spending on repair preparation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection capabilityVSAvoidapplicability to various pipeline conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical pigging system with a magnetic field-based inspection system. Magnetic sensors and magnets are used to detect defects without requiring physical insertion into the pipeline, thereby expanding applicability to pipelines that cannot accommodate intelligent pigs while maintaining defect detection capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces magnetic field as an intermediary between the inspection device and the pipeline. By using magnetic flux leakage and magnetic particle indication as mediators, the system can detect defects indirectly without requiring direct mechanical contact or disruption, thus improving versatility across different pipeline conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If high residual level magnetization is performed before pigging, then defect detection is enabled, but future technical problems of pipeline demagnetization are created that are required for actual pipe repair

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection capabilityVSAvoidadditional demagnetization process
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the magnetization function from the inspection process itself. By using portable magnetic sensors that detect magnetic flux leakage from defects in normally magnetized pipelines, the system separates the magnetization requirement from the inspection device, eliminating the need for subsequent demagnetization operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes the pipeline's existing magnetic properties and operational environment to perform self-inspection. The magnetic field methods leverage the natural magnetic state of the pipeline during normal operation, allowing the pipeline to essentially inspect itself without requiring external magnetization or demagnetization processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If pipe-line pigging method is used for defect detection, then comprehensive defect types can be detected, but the method is very expensive and labor-consuming with significant preparation requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect type coverageVSAvoidinspection efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the labor-intensive mechanical pigging process with automated magnetic field-based inspection systems. This substitution maintains the ability to detect various defect types while dramatically improving inspection efficiency by eliminating manual preparation, launch, and retrieval operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal inspection system that can detect multiple defect types (cracks, corrosion, weld defects, geometric abnormalities) using a single magnetic field-based methodology. This multi-functional approach replaces the need for multiple specialized inspection methods while reducing overall inspection complexity and cost

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Measurement precision

If traditional assessment methods are used for structural integrity, then flaw detection is performed, but real-time monitoring capabilities are lacking leading to potential failures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflaw detection capabilityVSAvoidreal-time monitoring capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms static, periodic inspection methods into dynamic, real-time monitoring systems. By implementing continuous or frequent magnetic field-based measurements, the system can detect defect development over time and provide real-time alerts, thereby improving reliability while maintaining flaw detection precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces feedback mechanisms where inspection results are continuously analyzed and used to adjust monitoring strategies. The system provides feedback on defect progression, risk assessment, and maintenance needs, enabling real-time decision-making and improving overall structural reliability through active monitoring rather than passive periodic inspection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach increases the reliability and accuracy of maintenance scheduling, expands applicability to various metallic structures, and reduces costs by providing real-time alerts and precise risk-factor ranking, ensuring timely interventions and minimizing pipeline failures.

Implementation Method 1

non-contact detection of anomalies within the structure using remote magnetic tomography (MT)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field: Magnetic Field

Implementation Method 2

calculation of the mechanical stress around the respective anomalies found, performing in-contact non-destructive mechanical stress measurement

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical stress: Stress Relaxation

Data Source

PatentUS8447532B1Metallic constructions integrity assessment and maintenance planning method
Publication Date: 2013.05.21 GOROSHEVSKIY VALERIAN
  • US8447532B1 patent drawing
  • US8447532B1 patent drawing
  • US8447532B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for metallic structure maintenance is disclosed. The method includes a magneto-graphic/Magnetic Tomography technique to identify stress-related defects. The method is specifically optimized for extended, non-accessible underground and underwater metallic structures in providing quality control, emergency alarms as well as timeline planning for structural repairs and maintenance work. Examples of the method implementation include pipes for oil and gas industry, detection of flaws in rolled products in metallurgical industry, welding quality of heavy duty equipment such as ships reservoirs, etc. It is especially important for loaded constructions, such as pressured pipes, infrastructure maintenance, nuclear power plant monitoring, bridges, corrosion prevention and environment protection.