Magnetically Enhanced EMP Device Using Charged-Particle Graphite

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing EMP generating devices face challenges such as destructive nuclear radiation, lack of mobility, high energy requirements, and insufficient intensity, making them unsuitable for tactical warfare and requiring localized energy generation.

Innovation Solution

A magnetically enhanced EMP generating device using charged-particle intercalated graphite and a non-geomagnetic magnetic field, where the graphite is positioned around a high explosive, which is detonated to release charged particles that are further accelerated by the magnetic field, enhancing the intensity of the electromagnetic pulse.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If a nuclear explosion is used to generate an EMP, then the EMP intensity is sufficient, but substantial amounts of blast energy, thermal energy, and nuclear radiation are generated which are very destructive and not localized

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveEMP intensityVSAvoidblast energy, thermal energy, and nuclear radiation
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and isolates the EMP generation function from the harmful effects of nuclear explosions. By using a capacitor bank discharged through a resonant antenna system, the patent achieves EMP generation without the blast, thermal, and radiation effects associated with nuclear devices. The harmful factors are effectively removed while preserving the desired EMP functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the physical parameters of EMP generation by using conventional capacitor banks and resonant antenna systems instead of nuclear explosions. By tuning the resonant frequency of the antenna system to match the desired EMP characteristics, the patent achieves controlled EMP intensity without the uncontrolled destructive parameters of nuclear detonation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Power

If a large capacitor bank is used to generate an EMP, then the EMP can be generated, but the device lacks mobility and requires large amounts of energy

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveEMP generation capabilityVSAvoidmobility
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The invention segments the EMP generation system into modular components including the capacitor bank, resonant antenna system, and control mechanisms. This segmentation allows for more flexible deployment and potential mobility improvements compared to monolithic nuclear systems, while maintaining the required power output for effective EMP generation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Device complexity

If conventional explosives are used to accelerate charged particles, then the device can be simplified, but the generated EMP does not have sufficient intensity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice structureVSAvoidEMP intensity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges conventional explosives with charged-particle intercalated graphite and a non-geomagnetic magnetic field to achieve sufficient EMP intensity. The explosive provides initial particle acceleration, the magnetic field further accelerates the charged particles through the Lorentz force, and the combination produces the required EMP intensity while maintaining relative device simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution significantly increases the intensity of the EMP by a factor of about 1000, providing a more localized and mobile energy source suitable for tactical applications without the drawbacks of nuclear explosions.

Implementation Method 1

The non-geomagnetic magnetic field may further accelerate the charged particles released from the charged-particle intercalated graphite

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLorentz force: Lorentz Force

Implementation Method 2

The detonation of the explosive may accelerate charged particles released from the charged-particle intercalated graphite

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDetonation: Detonation

Data Source

PatentUS10969207B1Magnetically enhanced EMP generating device
Publication Date: 2021.04.06 THE BOEING CO
  • US10969207B1 patent drawing
  • US10969207B1 patent drawing
  • US10969207B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatuses, systems, and methods for producing an electromagnetic pulse (EMP). Charged-particle intercalated graphite is disposed at least partially around an explosive and both are positioned within a non-geomagnetic magnetic field. The non-geomagnetic magnetic field accelerates charged particles released by the detonation of the explosive. The non-geomagnetic magnetic field may be generated by permanent magnets. The explosive may be formed in a layer with the non-geomagnetic field being oriented perpendicular to the layer. The layer may be form in the shape of a disc. The explosive and the charged-particle intercalated graphite may be positioned within a resonant cavity that is configured to amplify one or more specific frequencies of electromagnetic energy.