Magnetizable Particle Imaging for Neuronal Spatial Resolution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current magnetic resonance imaging techniques have a spatial resolution limit of around 500 microns, which is not sufficient to distinguish individual neurons, as they are between 4 and 100 microns in diameter, and existing magnetic particle imaging methods have a spatial resolution of several millimeters due to limitations in magnetic field gradients and slew rates.

Innovation Solution

The use of very high magnetic gradients and slew rates, enabled by prior advancements, in magnetizable particle imaging to achieve high spatial resolution, allowing for the differentiation of individual neurons and reporting their physiological and anatomical attributes, which can be incorporated into computer simulations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional magnetic resonance imaging is used, then the imaging method is safe without nerve stimulation, but the spatial resolution is limited to around 500 microns which is insufficient to distinguish individual neurons

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespatial resolutionVSAvoidnerve stimulation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by transitioning from conventional MRI to magnetic particle imaging with fundamentally different magnetic field parameters. Specifically, it uses very high magnetic gradients (100-1000 times stronger than conventional MRI) and high slew rates, combined with ultrashort pulse durations (microsecond to nanosecond range), to achieve sub-cellular spatial resolution (4-100 microns) while avoiding nerve stimulation through optimized pulse timing and gradient strength parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If magnetic particle imaging with conventional gradients is used, then the method is simpler to implement, but the spatial resolution is only several millimeters which is inadequate for neuronal imaging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespatial resolutionVSAvoidmagnetic field gradient system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by implementing time-varying magnetic field gradients with very high slew rates (rate of change of gradient over time). The system uses dynamically switching gradient fields with ultrashort pulse durations, where the gradients are turned on and off rapidly in the microsecond to nanosecond range, enabling high spatial resolution through the dynamic interaction between the time-varying gradients and magnetizable particles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dramatically changes the magnetic field gradient parameters from conventional values to very high gradients (100-1000 times stronger), combined with ultrashort pulse durations. This parameter transformation enables the system to achieve sub-cellular spatial resolution (4-100 microns) necessary for distinguishing individual neurons, while the rapid switching prevents harmful nerve stimulation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If very high magnetic gradients and slew rates are applied, then high spatial resolution is achieved to distinguish individual neurons, but there is risk of causing unpleasant nerve stimulation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespatial resolutionVSAvoidnerve stimulation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies periodic action by using ultrashort pulsed magnetic field gradients with precise timing. The gradients are applied in repeated short pulses (microsecond to nanosecond duration) rather than continuously, allowing the tissue to recover between pulses. This periodic application with optimized duty cycles achieves high spatial resolution through the strong gradients while preventing cumulative nerve stimulation by keeping each pulse duration below the neural excitation threshold

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies the skipping principle by using ultrashort pulse durations that rush through the magnetic field application so quickly that harmful nerve stimulation cannot occur. The gradients are applied and removed in such brief time windows (microsecond to nanosecond range) that the neural tissue does not have sufficient time to respond with unwanted stimulation, yet the intense gradient strength during this brief window achieves the necessary spatial resolution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the spatial resolution to distinguish individual neurons without causing unpleasant nerve stimulation, allowing for accurate in vivo measurements and simulations of neuronal function, improving the characterization of brain anatomy and physiology.

Implementation Method 1

very high magnetic gradients and magnetic slew rates (for example, those enabled by the prior invention by I. N. Weinberg discussed herein) are applied to magnetizable particle imaging

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic gradient: Magnetic Field

Data Source

PatentUS9772387B2Method and apparatus for high resolution physiological imaging of neurons
Publication Date: 2017.09.26 WEINBERG MEDICAL PHYSICS INC
  • US9772387B2 patent drawing
  • US9772387B2 patent drawing
  • US9772387B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In accordance with disclosed embodiments, very high magnetic gradients and magnetic slew are applied to magnetizable particle imaging in order to realize high spatial resolution.