Magnetizing Device for Magnetic Field Sensor Arrays

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional magnetic field sensors experience elevated noise and undesirable zero field errors due to misorientation of magnetization when exposed to high magnetic field strengths, and existing magnetizing methods suffer from parasitic capacitances causing undesirable current flows in magnetizing devices.

Innovation Solution

A method and system using a magnetizing device with parallel-connected half-bridges and center tap connections to divide the magnetizing current conductor into separately controllable segments, preventing parasitic capacitance-induced current flows in undesirable directions, thereby ensuring proper magnetization orientation and reducing noise and zero field errors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If a magnetizing current conductor is used to magnetize magnetic field sensors, then magnetization orientation is improved, but parasitic capacitances cause undesirable current flows in opposite directions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnetization orientationVSAvoidparasitic capacitance-induced current flow
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The magnetizing device is divided into multiple independently controllable half-bridge circuits, each capable of magnetizing specific sensor groups. This segmentation allows selective activation of magnetizing paths, preventing parasitic current flows from affecting the entire array when only certain sensors require magnetization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The half-bridge circuits are pre-configured with switches and center tap connections before magnetization begins. This preliminary setup ensures that magnetizing current paths are established in advance, allowing controlled current direction and preventing reverse current flows caused by parasitic capacitances during the magnetization process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple switches are used to control magnetizing segments, then separate magnetization control is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparate magnetization controlVSAvoidnumber of switches
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Each half-bridge circuit serves multiple functions: it can magnetize different sensor groups, control current direction, and prevent parasitic current flows. This multi-functionality reduces the need for additional dedicated components, balancing control versatility with device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The center tap connections act as intermediaries between the power supply and the magnetizing current conductors. These center taps provide a reference point that simplifies the switching control logic, allowing each half-bridge to independently control its magnetizing segment without requiring complex coordination between all switches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If magnetizing current flows in opposite direction due to parasitic capacitances, then noise and zero field errors increase, but the magnetizing device structure remains simple

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise reductionVSAvoidmagnetizing device structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The magnetizing device uses dynamically controllable switches in each half-bridge circuit to adjust current direction and magnitude in real-time. This dynamic control prevents parasitic capacitances from causing reverse current flows, thereby reducing noise and zero field errors without requiring a fundamentally complex static structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively reduces noise in magnetic field sensors, especially at high magnetic field strengths, and prevents undesirable changes in zero field error and gain, ensuring accurate magnetization of magnetic field sensors.

Implementation Method 1

A magnetizing current conductor of the magnetizing device is situated so as to run in the area of the magnetic field sensors in such a way that elements of the magnetic field sensors may be magnetized

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

Certain conventional magnetic field sensors are based on magnetoresistive effects. Magnetic field sensors of this type include two magnetized layers situated one above the other

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetoresistive effect: Magnetoresistance

Data Source

PatentUS11598829B2Method and system for magnetizing elements of a magnetic field sensor array
Publication Date: 2023.03.07 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US11598829B2 patent drawing
  • US11598829B2 patent drawing
  • US11598829B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A magnetic field sensor array includes a plurality of sensor segments, each including a plurality of magnetic field sensors. A magnetizing current conductor is situated so as to run in the area of the magnetic field sensors in such a way that elements of the magnetic field sensors may be magnetized. A plurality of parallel-connected half-bridges, each including a high switch pJ and a low switch nJ, each include a center tap connection situated between the switches. The magnetizing current conductor is connected to each center tap connection, by means of which the magnetizing current conductor is divided into separately activatable magnetizing segments. Elements of a sensor segment are magnetized in that two switches nJ and pJ+1 having different electrical potentials, or alternatively pJ and nJ+1, of two directly adjacent half-bridges are closed simultaneously. At least one further switch nX<J or pY>J+1 or alternatively pX<J or nY>J+1 is closed.