Magnetometer Insole Sensing for Foot Presence and Step Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing motorized lacing systems for footwear face challenges such as high cost of manufacture, complexity, assembly difficulties, lack of serviceability, and fragile mechanical mechanisms, making them unsuitable for mass production and daily use.

Innovation Solution

A modular footwear platform with interchangeable motorized and non-motorized lacing engines, featuring a robust mechanical design, serviceable components, and streamlined assembly processes, including a mid-sole plate that allows for late-stage integration of lacing engines and visual/tactile feedback through LED lighting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If motorized lacing systems are implemented in footwear, then automated tightening function is achieved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated tightening functionVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The lacing system is divided into independent modular components: a motorized lacing engine, a footwear article with receptacle, and interchangeable parts. This segmentation allows each component to be manufactured separately using optimized processes, reducing overall manufacturing complexity and cost while maintaining automated functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The motorized lacing engine is designed as a universal module that can be integrated into different footwear articles through standardized receptacles. This multi-functionality allows a single engine design to serve multiple shoe models, reducing tooling costs and enabling economies of scale in production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Extent of automation

If motorized lacing systems are implemented in footwear, then automated tightening function is achieved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated tightening functionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the system into distinct modular units (motorized engine, receptacle, footwear article), the complexity of each individual component is reduced and managed independently, making the overall system easier to design, manufacture, and service.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates self-contained modular units that can be independently serviced or replaced. The interchangeable nature of components allows for easy maintenance without requiring complex disassembly or specialized service procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Extent of automation

If motorized lacing systems are implemented in footwear, then automated tightening function is achieved, but assembly difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated tightening functionVSAvoidassembly difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The segmented modular design allows assembly to occur in discrete steps with clearly defined interfaces. The motorized lacing engine can be assembled and tested independently, then integrated into the footwear article through standardized receptacles, simplifying the overall assembly process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Components are pre-assembled and pre-tested as modular units before final integration. The motorized lacing engine is prepared in advance with all necessary sub-components, reducing on-site assembly complexity and enabling late-stage integration as specified in the patent.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Extent of automation

If motorized lacing systems are implemented in footwear, then automated tightening function is achieved, but serviceability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated tightening functionVSAvoidserviceability
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The segmented modular architecture allows any faulty component to be independently accessed and replaced. The motorized lacing engine can be removed and replaced without disassembling the entire footwear, significantly improving serviceability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system is designed to allow easy replacement of worn or faulty components. Individual modules such as the motorized lacing engine can be discarded and replaced with new or refurbished units, extending the overall system life without requiring complete replacement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

5Extent of automation

If motorized lacing systems are implemented in footwear, then automated tightening function is achieved, but mechanical reliability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated tightening functionVSAvoidmechanical mechanism reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Segmenting the mechanical system into isolated modular components reduces the propagation of mechanical stresses and failures. Each module can be designed with optimized mechanical structures for its specific function, improving overall reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system includes self-contained modular units with built-in protection against mechanical failure. The interchangeable design allows rapid replacement of failed components, maintaining system reliability through quick restoration of function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables reliable operation, retail-level customization, and efficient assembly of motorized lacing systems with interchangeable components, addressing the limitations of previous designs.

Implementation Method 1

a magnetometer to measure a strength or direction of a magnetic field that is influenced by a position of the ferromagnetic body

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic field: Magnetic Field

Data Source

PatentEP3429410B1Foot presence sensing using magnets in footwear
Publication Date: 2025.08.13 NIKE INNOVATE CV
  • EP3429410B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3429410B1 patent drawingFigure 2A
  • EP3429410B1 patent drawingFigure 2B

AI summary

An article of footwear can include a ferromagnetic body disposed in the article, and a magnetometer to measure a strength or direction of a magnetic field that is influenced by a position of the ferromagnetic body. One of the ferromagnetic body and the magnetometer can be configured to move relative to the other one of the ferromagnetic body and the magnetometer, for example according to movement of a foot in the article. In an example, the ferromagnetic body is disposed in a compressible insole and the ferromagnetic body moves in response to compression or relaxation of the insole. The magnetometer can be disposed in a platform or sole portion of the article that is relatively stationary compared to the ferromagnetic body. Rate of change information about the magnetic field can be used to control article functions or to provide information about a foot strike or step rate.