Mail Piece Interception System with Manifest-Based Routing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current postal and delivery services lack the ability to facilitate bulk mail piece interception, monitoring, and alerting, particularly for situations where multiple mail pieces need to be intercepted or rerouted, and do not provide mechanisms for authorized parties other than senders or recipients to receive alerts or instruct carriers to confiscate suspicious mail pieces.

Innovation Solution

A system that projects delivery routes and schedules for mail pieces, monitors carrier-recorded tracking events, and provides alerts to users and authorized parties, allowing for intercept, rescue, and confiscation instructions to be sent to carriers, enabling manifest-wide and mail-piece-specific intercept requests, and allowing other parties to receive alerts and instruct carriers to confiscate suspicious items.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If individual mail piece interception is implemented, then delivery control capability is improved, but operational complexity increases for bulk mail pieces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemail piece interception capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity for bulk interception
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple individual mail piece interception requests into a single manifest-wide interception operation. The system allows users to submit one intercept request that applies to all mail pieces listed in a manifest, rather than requiring separate requests for each piece. This merging approach maintains delivery control capability while significantly reducing operational complexity for bulk mail interceptions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The interception system is designed to handle multiple functions through a single interface: it can process individual mail piece interceptions, manifest-wide interceptions, and provide selective application of intercept instructions to specific mail pieces within a manifest. This multi-functionality improves ease of operation by providing a unified approach that adapts to different interception needs without requiring separate systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If sender and recipient only can instruct carriers, then security control is simplified, but alert accessibility is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemail piece security controlVSAvoidauthorized party alert reception
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary authorization mechanism that allows senders and recipients to designate third parties as authorized recipients of alerts and instructors of carrier actions. This intermediary layer expands alert accessibility to authorized parties while maintaining security control through the original sender's authorization. The system verifies authorization credentials and routes alerts appropriately, enabling versatile alert distribution without compromising security protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If manual tracking monitoring is used, then system complexity is reduced, but delivery route monitoring precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetracking system complexityVSAvoiddelivery route monitoring accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements an automated feedback system that continuously monitors mail piece tracking events against projected delivery routes and schedules. The system automatically compares actual tracking data with expected milestones, identifies deviations, and triggers alerts when variances exceed predetermined thresholds. This feedback mechanism enhances monitoring precision by providing real-time, automated route verification without requiring complex manual intervention systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The tracking monitoring system operates autonomously by automatically projecting delivery routes, monitoring tracking events, comparing actual performance against projections, and generating alerts for variances. This self-service capability achieves high monitoring precision through automated algorithms while keeping system complexity manageable by eliminating the need for manual tracking analysis. The system serves itself by automatically performing all monitoring functions without human intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Ease of operation

If single mail piece intercept requests are processed, then individual control is improved, but processing efficiency decreases for bulk mail

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindividual mail piece controlVSAvoidbulk mail interception efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple individual intercept requests into a single batch processing operation. The manifest interception feature allows users to submit one request that processes all mail pieces in the manifest simultaneously, rather than requiring sequential processing of each individual piece. This combining approach maintains individual mail piece control through selective application options while dramatically improving processing efficiency for bulk mail by reducing the number of transactions and system operations required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS10600019B1Systems and methods for mail piece interception, rescue tracking, and confiscation alerts and related services
Publication Date: 2020.03.24 AUCTANE INC
  • US10600019B1 patent drawing
  • US10600019B1 patent drawing
  • US10600019B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Exemplary embodiments of the present invention would project a route and a delivery schedule for relevant mail pieces and would monitor carrier recorded tracking events for those mail pieces to determine whether or not actual tracking events are following the projected route and the projected schedule, and/or whether or not issues that might impact their delivery and/or their delivery schedule, may have arisen along their projected route; such exemplary embodiments would provide an alert to the relevant user(s) and/or other authorized parties and/or relevant carrier(s) and would facilitate user interaction by the relevant user(s) and/or parties to provide intercept and/or rescue and/or confiscation instructions; exemplary embodiments would facilitate automatic interfaces with the relevant carriers and delivery services for the subject mail piece to resolve rescue, item loss, insurance coverage, postage refund, intervention and/or confiscation instructions and issues.