Mail Item Validity Assessment Using Image Overlay Indicators

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Consumers face challenges in distinguishing between valid and fraudulent monetary solicitations in physical and electronic mail, particularly affecting the elderly and those of diminished mental capacity, who are often targeted by mail fraud.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilize a non-transitory computer-readable medium to analyze images of mail items, identify data fields, determine their validity, and generate a user-interactive image overlay with validity indicators and action recommendations, enabling users to assess the legitimacy of monetary solicitations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If consumers manually review mail items to distinguish valid from fraudulent solicitations, then they can identify potential fraud, but the process is time-consuming and error-prone especially for elderly and vulnerable individuals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of fraud detectionVSAvoidtime to review mail items
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual human review of mail items with an automated image processing system using machine learning models. The system captures images of mail items, extracts text and visual features, and automatically validates information against multiple data sources (credit bureaus, charity registries, business databases) to determine fraud likelihood, eliminating the need for consumers to manually examine each mail piece.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a digital copy of the physical mail item through image capture and processing. This digital representation is then analyzed by machine learning models that compare the mail's visual characteristics, text content, and data fields against known patterns of legitimate and fraudulent solicitations, enabling rapid automated validation without handling the physical item.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If comprehensive validation checks are performed on all mail items, then fraud detection accuracy improves, but system complexity and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalidity determination accuracyVSAvoidsystem processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The validation system is divided into multiple specialized machine learning models, each trained to detect specific fraud indicators (text analysis, visual pattern recognition, data field validation). These segmented models process different aspects of the mail item independently, then combine their results to produce an overall fraud assessment, making the complex validation task more manageable and efficient.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary image processing layer that extracts and structures key information from mail item images before passing data to validation models. This intermediary processing step standardizes the input data format and identifies critical fields (payee name, amount, account numbers), reducing the complexity burden on subsequent validation stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If multiple data sources are queried to validate mail item information, then fraud detection reliability improves, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata validation accuracyVSAvoidmail item processing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary validation checks using quickly accessible data sources first (such as checking against known fraudulent patterns, basic format validation, and readily available public registries). Only mail items that fail preliminary checks or require deeper verification are then queried against more comprehensive but slower databases, optimizing the overall processing speed while maintaining high validation accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12223486B2Assessing validity of mail item
Publication Date: 2025.02.11 WELLS FARGO BANK NA
  • US12223486B2 patent drawing
  • US12223486B2 patent drawing
  • US12223486B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The validity of a mail item containing a monetary solicitation is determined. An image is received of the mail item and the image is analyzed to identify a plurality of data fields within the mail item. The validity or invalidity of the data within each of the plurality of identified data fields is then established, and a user-interactive image overlay is generated for the image of the mail item that includes a validity indicator for each of the plurality of identified data fields. The validity indicator is representative of the validity or invalidity of the data within each of the identified plurality of data fields. The user-interactive image overlay is sent to a user device to display the image of the mail item.