Automated Mail Routing via Image Recognition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Large organizations face challenges in efficiently routing communications, especially when there are insufficiently, incorrectly, or erroneously addressed mail items, and in adapting communication hubs to changes in entity locations, functions, or characteristics, leading to inefficiencies in distributing communications across a smaller number of hubs or a single hub.

Innovation Solution

The development of apparatus and methods that utilize computer-readable code and media to process mail items by identifying entities within an organization through image recognition and library vector matching, allowing for the routing of mail items to their correct destinations based on textual and physical parameters, even when addresses are incomplete or incorrect.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a smaller number of communication hubs are used to service subsets of entities, then cost and structural complexity are reduced, but adaptability to changes in entity locations and functions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of communication hubsVSAvoidadaptability to entity changes
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically detects address errors and identifies correct destinations without human intervention. The error detection mechanism self-corrects routing mistakes by comparing mail item addresses against a database of valid entity locations and functions, allowing the hub to adapt to changes autonomously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where routing outcomes are continuously monitored and used to update the entity database. When mail items are successfully routed or when address errors are detected and corrected, this information feeds back into the system to improve future routing decisions and maintain adaptability despite using fewer hubs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of information

If current hub address information is provided to the public and internal individuals, then information accessibility is improved, but accuracy and reliability deteriorate due to frequent changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation accessibilityVSAvoidaddress information accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary validation of address information against the entity database before routing decisions are made. By checking addresses against stored entity locations and functions in advance, the system prevents distribution of outdated or incorrect address information, maintaining reliability while providing accessible information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically updates address information in the entity database when changes are detected through error detection mechanisms. This allows the information provided to users to remain current and accurate, reflecting real-time changes in entity locations and functions rather than relying on static, potentially outdated information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If mail items with insufficient or erroneous address information are distributed through traditional hubs, then distribution speed is maintained, but routing accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemail distribution speedVSAvoidrouting accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary address validation and error detection before mail items enter the distribution workflow. By identifying and correcting address errors in advance, the system ensures accurate routing decisions are made early in the process, maintaining both speed and precision without requiring slower manual verification later.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual address verification processes with automated error detection mechanisms that use database comparisons and pattern recognition. This substitution maintains high distribution speed while dramatically improving routing accuracy, as the automated system can process addresses faster and more accurately than manual methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS9212007B2Correction of customer mailing information
Publication Date: 2015.12.15 BANK OF AMERICA CORP
  • US9212007B2 patent drawing
  • US9212007B2 patent drawing
  • US9212007B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatus, methods, media and code for applying a mailing label are provided. The apparatus may include a mail receipt conveyor; a mail registration station that is configured to receive from the mail receipt conveyor a mail item that includes on an exterior surface of an envelope a printed message indicating that a customer name appearing on the mail item does not correspond to an address on the mail item; an imaging device that is configured to capture a delivery error segment of the surface; a processor device that is configured to identify an electronic mail address that corresponds to a customer name in the addressee segment of the surface; and a transmitter device that is configured to transmit to the email address an electronic form for electronically receiving a different address.