Automated Mailing Label Tracking and Deferred Billing System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current postal systems face inefficiencies in tracking and billing for return shipping labels, particularly in manual processes that result in high costs and lost revenue due to the lack of automated detection and accounting for return labels, leading to wasted postage and increased expenses for both shippers and the postal service.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that generate mailing labels with tracking marks, allowing for automated detection and recording of postage transactions when the label is inducted into the mail stream, enabling accurate billing only when the label is used, and utilizing fictitiously funded accounts to defer payment until the label is scanned, thus eliminating upfront costs and manual accounting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual weighing and logging of return labels is used, then the postal service can process return mail, but labor costs and processing time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidmanual operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical processes (weighing, visual inspection, handwriting) with automated systems including sensors, barcode scanners, and computer systems that automatically detect tracking marks, weigh packages, and log transactions, thereby increasing productivity while reducing manual labor

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service through automated detection and processing where the return label's tracking mark automatically triggers identification and billing processes without requiring manual intervention at each step, allowing the system to process itself

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If permit-based return labels are used, then the postal service can track return mail, but annual fees and accounting costs are imposed on account holders

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetracking capabilityVSAvoidcost burden
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the permit requirement from the return label system, allowing labels to be generated and used without requiring account holders to maintain costly permits, thereby reducing the cost burden while maintaining tracking capability through the centralized system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-generating return labels with tracking marks and storing them in a database before they are needed, allowing account holders to have labels ready without upfront permit costs, and only charges when the label is actually used

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If return labels are distributed in bulk without tracking, then shippers can provide return options, but the postal service loses revenue from unused labels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabel distributionVSAvoidrevenue loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the centralized system receives notifications when return labels are inducted into the mail stream through tracking mark detection, automatically updating transaction records and charging account holders only for used labels, thereby preventing revenue loss from unused labels

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-distributing labels in bulk without charge, then automatically charges only for labels that are actually used and detected in the mail stream, eliminating the need to pre-charge for potentially unused labels

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Measurement precision

If manual weighing and rate computation is performed at Postage Due units, then the postal service can bill for return mail, but processing time and labor costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweight measurementVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual weighing and rate computation with automated sensors and computer systems that automatically measure weight, detect tracking marks, lookup rates, and compute charges, thereby maintaining measurement precision while dramatically reducing processing time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges multiple functions (detection, weighing, rate lookup, computation, and logging) into a single integrated automated process at the Point of Induction, eliminating the need for separate manual steps at Postage Due units

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS9639822B2Method and system for detecting a mailed item
Publication Date: 2017.05.02 ULTISAT INC
  • US9639822B2 patent drawing
  • US9639822B2 patent drawing
  • US9639822B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system of processing a mailing label through a postal service are provided. The method includes causing, by a computer system associated with a postage provider, a mailing label for mailing a mail piece to be generated, the mailing label including a tracking mark; receiving, by the computer system associated with the postage provider an indication that the tracking mark is detected when the mail piece is inducted in the mail stream or during transit of the mail piece in the mail stream; and creating, by the computer system associated with the postage provider, a record of a transaction for an amount of postage based on the received indication that the tracking mark is detected.