Maintenance Dispatch System Using Failure Influence Degree

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current maintenance systems for shops, such as supermarkets or convenience stores, lack the ability to selectively dispatch maintenance workers based on the specific influence of a failure on the shop, leading to inefficient repair responses.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus that includes a communication interface, shop database, and maintenance worker database, which receives failure information, determines the degree of influence on the shop, and selects an appropriate maintenance worker based on skill levels and priority, ensuring timely and effective dispatch.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If maintenance workers are dispatched based solely on skill levels, then repair quality is improved, but response efficiency to critical failures deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverepair qualityVSAvoidresponse efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the dispatch parameters from solely skill-based to a multi-dimensional parameter system that includes failure influence degree, worker skill level, and current workload. This allows the system to select workers based on composite criteria rather than a single parameter, resolving the contradiction between repair quality and response efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic dispatching where worker selection adapts based on real-time conditions including the severity of the failure, the worker's skill profile, and current assignment status. This dynamic approach allows critical failures to be prioritized while maintaining overall system efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If all failures are treated with equal priority, then simplicity is maintained, but loss of time in critical situations increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesimplicityVSAvoiddowntime
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a failure influence degree parameter that transforms the dispatch system from uniform treatment to differentiated priority handling. This parameter enables the system to automatically prioritize critical failures without requiring complex manual assessment, maintaining operational simplicity while reducing downtime for urgent cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If high-skill workers are dispatched to all failures, then repair quality is improved, but productivity of the maintenance system deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverepair qualityVSAvoidmaintenance system efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by matching worker skill levels to the specific requirements of each failure type. Instead of uniformly deploying high-skill workers to all situations, the system assigns workers based on the local needs of each failure case, optimizing both repair quality and overall system productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial action by deploying workers with sufficient skill levels for each specific failure rather than always using the highest skill level available. This prevents over-allocation of high-skill workers to minor issues, thereby maintaining maintenance system productivity while ensuring adequate repair quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11715073B2Information processing apparatus and information processing method of information processing apparatus
Publication Date: 2023.08.01 TOSHIBA TEC KK
  • US11715073B2 patent drawing
  • US11715073B2 patent drawing
  • US11715073B2 patent drawing

AI summary

According to an embodiment, an information processing apparatus includes a communication interface, a shop database, a maintenance worker database, and a controller. The controller determines a degree of influence of a failure on a shop on the basis of failure information received by the communication interface and shop information stored in the shop database. The controller compares the determined degree of influence with a degree of influence in other shop and determines the priority of a response to the failure in the shop. The controller selects an appropriate maintenance worker from maintenance workers stored in the maintenance worker database on the basis of the determined priority.