Maintenance Optimization Model for Aircraft Supportability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for evaluating aircraft design and maintenance strategies, such as DOCsys, fail to consider essential factors like fuel consumption, regulation aspects, and comprehensive maintenance strategies, leading to incomplete assessments of supportability performance.

Innovation Solution

A Maintenance Optimization Model (MOM) is developed to evaluate design choices and maintenance policies, considering future operational conditions and user expectations, by determining relevant outputs and inputs, examining relationships, and selecting criteria to design the model for improved supportability performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional DOC methods are used for aircraft evaluation, then calculation simplicity is maintained, but comprehensiveness of cost elements is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensiveness of evaluationVSAvoidcomplexity of evaluation method
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The evaluation method segments Direct Operating Costs into distinct categories (fuel costs, direct maintenance costs, capital costs, delay costs) and evaluates each separately using standardized formulas, allowing comprehensive assessment while maintaining calculability through structured breakdown

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If DOCsys method is used to incorporate system-specific parameters, then evaluation accuracy improves, but applicability to future aircraft designs decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of supportability assessmentVSAvoidadaptability to future designs
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The method uses standardized parameter definitions and formulas that can be applied across different aircraft types and design phases. By establishing consistent calculation approaches for fuel consumption, maintenance costs, and operational parameters, the method achieves both precision in assessment and adaptability to future aircraft designs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If comprehensive maintenance strategies are integrated, then life cycle cost optimization improves, but model complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization of life cycle costVSAvoidcomplexity of maintenance model
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The method performs preliminary evaluation of maintenance strategies during the design phase by calculating expected life cycle costs using standardized formulas. This allows optimization of maintenance approaches before actual operation, reducing complexity by establishing maintenance frameworks in advance rather than developing them during operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8560376B2Method, system, and computer program product for a maintenance optimization model
Publication Date: 2013.10.15 AIRBUS OPERATIONS (SAS)
  • US8560376B2 patent drawing
  • US8560376B2 patent drawing
  • US8560376B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of developing maintenance optimization model includes finding relevant criteria to drive the design towards operational performances at minimal cost for the end user, selecting inputs necessary to assess criteria selected, defining mathematical models to jointly drive the equipment/sub-system/system design and its support towards better supportability, and presenting the maintenance optimization model results to enable the exploration of the cause and effect relationships between design decisions and their operational and support impacts. The selected inputs may cover all the potential factors influencing the criteria values. The mathematical modeling can facilitate leveraging the intuitive “cause and effect” relationship between design and support, and affordability. The maintenance optimization model method, system, and computer program product provides a solid basis for the supportability evaluation of equipment/system/sub-system choices, particularly when integrated in a systematic way into the design process and used from the beginning of the development cycle.