Maintenance Support System Using Site-Level Model Reuse

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional installation maintenance support systems require relearning and significant computer resources for each installation, leading to inefficiencies and reduced credibility of the certainty factor for maintenance work content identification across installations with different specifications.

Innovation Solution

A maintenance support system that includes an element unit inference model acquisition unit to reuse learned models across installations with similar configuration elements, a maintenance work inference unit to estimate maintenance work content based on feature quantities from sensor data, and a maintenance work learning unit to iteratively evaluate and update the maintenance work inference model.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If individual learning is performed for each installation, then the maintenance work content can be identified for that specific installation, but computer resources increase and learning time extends significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification accuracyVSAvoidlearning time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the installation into multiple sites and performs learning independently for each site rather than for the entire installation. This allows learning results to be reused across installations that share common sites, reducing redundant learning while maintaining identification accuracy for each specific site's maintenance work content.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal learning result for each site that can be applied across multiple installations. Once a site's maintenance patterns are learned, the results are reused for all installations containing that site, making the learning process multi-functional and eliminating redundant learning across similar installations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If individual learning is performed for each installation, then the maintenance work content can be identified accurately, but computer resources for learning have to be prepared each time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecertainty factorVSAvoidcomputer resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent discards the approach of performing complete individual learning for each installation and recovers only the necessary site-specific learning results. By reusing learning results from common sites across different installations, the system reduces computer resource consumption while maintaining the certainty factor for maintenance work content identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Productivity

If learning is performed for each installation separately, then the maintenance work content can be identified, but the results cannot be utilized in other installations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance identification efficiencyVSAvoidcross-installation applicability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates universal learning results at the site level that can be applied across multiple installations. Each site's learning result becomes a reusable asset that improves both maintenance identification efficiency for that site and cross-installation applicability, as the same learning results serve multiple installations containing that site.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

By segmenting the installation into independent sites, the patent enables learning results to be transferred and reused across installations. This segmentation allows the system to balance productivity for specific sites with adaptability across different installations, as each site's maintenance patterns can be independently learned and universally applied.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If the certainty factor is individually calculated for each installation, then the maintenance work content can be presented with confidence, but the decrease in population parameter of data lowers credibility

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecertainty factor credibilityVSAvoiddata population
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges data from multiple installations that share common sites to calculate the certainty factor. By combining population parameters across installations with identical or similar sites, the system increases the data population used for certainty factor calculation, thereby improving its credibility while still providing installation-specific maintenance guidance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20250069046A1Maintenance support system, maintenance support method, and computer readable medium
Publication Date: 2025.02.27 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP
  • US20250069046A1 patent drawing
  • US20250069046A1 patent drawing
  • US20250069046A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A maintenance support system (500) supports maintenance work to be carried out by a maintenance worker for an installation (30). An element unit inference model acquisition unit (107) sets an element unit inference model (108) for estimation of a maintenance work content in units of installation configuration elements as initial values of a maintenance work inference model (105) for estimation of the maintenance work content for the installation (30). A maintenance work inference unit (109) estimates the maintenance work content to be presented to the maintenance worker by applying the maintenance work inference model (105) to a feature quantity of an abnormality. A maintenance work learning unit (104) iteratively evaluates whether the maintenance work content has been effective or not for cancellation of the abnormality, learns an effective maintenance work content concerning the feature quantity of the abnormality, and updates the maintenance work inference model (105).