Maintenance Work Support for Automated Fault Cause Identification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fault tree analysis systems require skilled operators to identify root causes, leading to inefficiencies and misdiagnosis due to reliance on manual judgment and lack of automation in identifying cause occurrences.

Innovation Solution

A maintenance work support system that separates the identification process into pre-work and collection/inspection, utilizing internal and external status information, and automates the judgment process through machine data and video/image analysis to determine cause occurrences.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If fault tree analysis is performed using manual judgment by operators, then the system can identify root causes, but skilled operators are required and misdiagnosis occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroot cause identification accuracyVSAvoidoperator skill requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by allowing unskilled operators to perform fault tree analysis through automated computer processing. The computer automatically determines cause occurrences based on status information, eliminating the need for operator expertise in judgment while maintaining accurate root cause identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of manual operator judgment with an automated computer-based system. The computer processes status information and automatically determines cause occurrences, substituting human cognitive functions with computational processes to eliminate skill requirements and reduce misdiagnosis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If automated judgment is implemented to eliminate skill requirements, then unskilled workers can perform analysis, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator skill requirementVSAvoidsystem automation level
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the fault tree analysis process into distinct automated components: status information acquisition, cause occurrence determination, and result presentation. Each component is handled by the computer system, breaking down the complex judgment process into manageable automated steps that can be executed without human expertise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The computer acts as an intermediary between the fault tree analysis system and the operator. It receives status information, processes it through automated determination of cause occurrences, and presents results to the operator, mediating the complex computational tasks while keeping the operator interface simple and skill-independent.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If manual status collection and judgment are used, then the system is simple to operate, but time consumption increases and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance analysis speedVSAvoidtime for cause identification
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by automatically determining cause occurrences based on pre-acquired status information. The computer is prepared to process status data and identify causes without waiting for manual operator analysis, significantly reducing the time required for maintenance analysis and improving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250208614A1Maintenance work support station
Publication Date: 2025.06.26 HITACHI LTD
  • US20250208614A1 patent drawing
  • US20250208614A1 patent drawing
  • US20250208614A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods described herein can involve a maintenance work support system for supporting maintenance work on a machine, which includes management of fault information, cause information, information regarding how to identify cause occurrences, and recovery method information, as fault tree information of the machine; acquiring status information of the machine; processing the status information for one or more of external status information or internal status information; determining a method to identify a cause occurrence of the machine from the processed external status information or the internal status information of the machine; executing the method to determine the cause occurrence of the machine; and displaying the fault tree information of the machine, the acquired status information, and the determined cause occurrence for the machine.